Nominate a new Supreme Moderator

ka that was just a waste of a post

Don't be immature K_A. I"m not saying he shouldn't be demodded from his Mod spot, but just not nominated as a Sup Mod being that he hasn't done much to show anything positive, l2read.

Don't be immature K_A. I"m not saying he shouldn't be demodded from his Mod spot, but just not nominated as a Sup Mod being that he hasn't done much to show anything positive, l2read.

Alright, so don't nominate him. This isn't a thread to debate why or why not to make someone a supreme mod.

Question: Once there has been a certain amount of deliberation, where will this 'process' go from there?.. A vote?.

Question: Once there has been a certain amount of deliberation, where will this 'process' go from there?.. A vote?.

Probably. Why wouldn't we vote?

We voted for K_A and Lenny after all.

I figured they might just deliberate amongst the rest of the Staff and go from there, that's why I asked.

Like was said before, this isn't a "dispute who should be nominated" thread. This is simply a nomination thread and why.

*Edit.

I guess if nobody else does, I'll tally this up tomorrow? If Chruser hasn't done so by then.

ey y am i not on the list

D3V

100% Member sence 06-29-2003 - 12:00 PM

Draco2003

70.8% Member sence 06-10-2004 - 11:10 PM

Jessifer

80.5% Member sence 11-03-2003 - 07:59 PM

Kazilla

100% Member sence 02-05-2006 - 08:52 PM

Sebarak

not being rude but, who is this? Member sence ????

-Spector-

34.1% Member sence 01-02-2003 - 11:59 AM

Thanatos

64.1% Member sence 11-04-2002 - 12:00 PM

WKFF

77.7% Member sence 09-24-2003 - 12:00 PM

I think that activity should be a big part in who is next, not only that, but how long the nominee has been here. We removed Yawgmoth for his inactivity so appointing another inactive member is pointless.

Dev wins. :P

What about me

D3V 100% Member sence 06-29-2003 - 12:00 PM Draco2003 70.8% Member sence 06-10-2004 - 11:10 PM Jessifer 80.5% Member sence 11-03-2003 - 07:59 PM Kazilla 100% Member sence 02-05-2006 - 08:52 PM Sebarak not being rude but, who is this? Member sence ???? -Spector- 34.1% Member sence 01-02-2003 - 11:59 AM Thanatos 64.1% Member sence 11-04-2002 - 12:00 PM WKFF 77.7% Member sence 09-24-2003 - 12:00 PM I think that activity should be a big part in who is next, not only that, but how long the nominee has been here. We removed Yawgmoth for his inactivity so appointing another inactive member is pointless.

I'm sure your opinion is completely unbiased.

I think that activity should be a big part in who is next, not only that, but how long the nominee has been here.

I've had a conversation with Chruser, and that is one of the main things that I think a moderator shoud have - good activity. There's no point in having a mod who's on once a month, but at the same time a member should not become a moderator because they've been at 100% for a few weeks. Ideally, it needs to be someone who is always on.