I think you are biased. I cant stand anyone throwing their opinons out on who won a debate when they are already solidly decided on a canidate. No hardcore kerry or hardcore bush fan will say the other side was better. Stop looking at it from what points you agreed on and look at it from a debate and intelligence contest view. And why is willy wonka wearing a can of peas and or beer on his head.
I'm not hardcore either way, I'm more for Bush than Kerry but with good reason. Nader could be a pretty good president if he straightened out his views a bit.
Is it really possible to not be biased in politics?
I'm not judging them, I'm comparing them by what MOST PEOPLE say about them. My opinion really didn't have much to do with it, not the first part anyway.