From now on, if a member has a problem with the way a member of the Staff is acting, they will contact a member of the Senior Staff (Admin or Sup Mod) about their complaint and plea their case. If that person feels as though they put up a good enough arguement, a thread will be made by the Senior Staff that was contacted.
No members are to make threads on this subject matter anymore. This is solely because as members, there is much you don't see in the restricted Forums, therefore, your judgement is only partially correct in many instances.
What if a moderator wants to know if people think he should be demodded. Can an exception be made for that? If so i request the "sov should be demodded" thread reopened. I want peoples opinions. If not disregard the last part of this post.
I won't reopen it, but I disagree with D3V completely. You're doing a great job Sov, and I'm far more likely to Sup. Mod you than demod you, actually.
"Stephen Wolfram is the creator of Mathematica and is widely regarded as the most important innovator in scientific and technical computing today." - Stephen Wolfram
Heh thanks chruser. And uncapped. I guareentee you that i am much different behind the scenes, in ad mod. I still dotn see why you of all people hate me. I dont think i have directly done anything to you to warrant you to want me demodded.
I like Sov as a mod/supmod, I hated K_A as a mod, I felt that my threads were under attack from K_Am and therefor did not enjoy seeing him as a mod. A mod needs to treat members fairly or they should not be a mod.
I use to be a shoe shinner now I sip Aunt Jamima, I go to sleep in Europe and wake back up in China. CLUB 977 The 80's Channel!!!!! -winamp radio is heaven on earth
I like Sov as a mod/supmod, I hated K_A as a mod, I felt that my threads were under attack from K_Am and therefor did not enjoy seeing him as a mod. A mod needs to treat members fairly or they should not be a mod.