Post 4 times every day for the next 9 days and you'll be at the top with lenny, and you'll get this cool postbit. Stay at 100% for 30 days and you'll get to keep the postbit permanently(as long as you stay above 50%)
He'll be above me, actually, on account of his earlier join date.
I still reckon it ought to be listed in alphabetical order...
Keep it up, slay!
No it shouldn't. If you're ranking members, basing it first off of activity and then off of join date makes more sense than basing it off of activity and position in the alphabet. An old member with 100% activity should be above a newer one with 100% activity :P
Do it alphabetically, or do it by the date they reached that activity.
To me, alphabetically makes more sense. What if someone, at the end of the alphabet, joined in 2002, didn't post at all for five years, then came back tomorrow and posted until they got 100%. Why should they get #1, rather than the person/people who have been posting since they arrived?