Zelaron Gaming Forum

Zelaron Gaming Forum (http://zelaron.com/forum/index.php)
-   The Lounge (http://zelaron.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=183)
-   -   Finally!#2!! (http://zelaron.com/forum/showthread.php?t=42648)

slaynish 2007-06-21 10:16 PM

Finally!#2!!
 
FINALLY my hard work is paying off.

#2 on the leaderboard for the most activity.

This (i think..) has been the highest up i've been.

GO ME!

!King_Amazon! 2007-06-21 10:35 PM

Post 4 times every day for the next 9 days and you'll be at the top with lenny, and you'll get this cool postbit. Stay at 100% for 30 days and you'll get to keep the postbit permanently(as long as you stay above 50%)

Sovereign 2007-06-22 12:17 AM

Yeah yeah. Been a busy week for me :(

MightyJoe 2007-06-22 08:04 AM

Go Slaynish!

Thanatos 2007-06-22 08:11 AM

hai u l00ser.

HandOfHeaven 2007-06-22 08:36 AM

Hooray 4 j00!

klo 2007-06-22 08:38 AM

Uhm, congrats?

!King_Amazon! 2007-06-22 08:40 AM

psst, guys, im gonna wait until slaynish has 1 day until 100%, and im gonna ban him so he loses it lolz.

psst, here's a secret, when ur banned u can still post in the talk to the staff forum, so if ur clever you wont actually lose any activity.

Lenny 2007-06-22 09:37 AM

He'll be above me, actually, on account of his earlier join date.

I still reckon it ought to be listed in alphabetical order... :rolleyes:

Keep it up, slay!

khwiii 2007-06-22 09:41 AM

Yay... you are the leet spaminator!

!King_Amazon! 2007-06-22 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny
He'll be above me, actually, on account of his earlier join date.

I still reckon it ought to be listed in alphabetical order... :rolleyes:

Keep it up, slay!

No it shouldn't. If you're ranking members, basing it first off of activity and then off of join date makes more sense than basing it off of activity and position in the alphabet. An old member with 100% activity should be above a newer one with 100% activity :P

Lenny 2007-06-22 09:48 AM

Nah.

Do it alphabetically, or do it by the date they reached that activity.

To me, alphabetically makes more sense. What if someone, at the end of the alphabet, joined in 2002, didn't post at all for five years, then came back tomorrow and posted until they got 100%. Why should they get #1, rather than the person/people who have been posting since they arrived?

!King_Amazon! 2007-06-22 09:49 AM

If anything, maybe do it by activity first, and then average posts per day second. That would make it fair-er I think.

Lenny 2007-06-22 09:53 AM

Either way, as long as someone who called themself Zzzz, joined in 2002, posted nothing, comes back tomorrow, and posts until they get 100%, doesn't knock me off the top spot, then I'll be happy. :rolleyes: :p

It's fine if slaynish does it - he's more or less posted since he joined.

kyeruu 2007-06-22 10:06 AM

congratulations on your amazing waste of time!

!King_Amazon! 2007-06-22 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kyeruu
congratulations on your amazing waste of time!

Jealousy at it's finest.

slaynish 2007-06-24 03:24 PM

Or we could do it on nationality.


Lets say...

1.Swedish yaa
2.AMERICA!
3.then brit's

Sovereign 2007-06-24 07:56 PM

Try to stay unbanned long enough to hit 100% plz.

slaynish 2007-06-24 08:37 PM

?

The only reason i was banned recently was because of something I didn't really mean to do. Well, I didn't intend to break any rules or anything, just adding to a joke.. I really dont get banned often anyways.

Sovereign 2007-06-25 11:04 PM

Check who I replied to.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.