Commentary on D3V's Post, The Amazing Atheist

So, ChristiAnity teaches gay-bashing? Where? It calls the act itself "abomination" but does NOT condone mistreating anyone under those circumstances. Yet again, it's mans influence and prejudice, not of Christianity itself. Try again, mkay?

Draco, thank you for actually reading my post. I can understand (definitely where I live) that some Christians often think more of themselves than they should. You and I are the same. No better, no worse. I'd like to read that book now, it seems to mirror my views that absolutely nothing but faith is necessary and that organized religion is frivolous. I'd like to counter your intelligence point though. How is it intelligent to murder your family and burn the house (as happened to my girlfriends friend)? Or to murder unborn children under the defense of choice when the choice should be "have sex or don't?"


That intelligence is flawed, though the examples might be as well.

Also, I'd like to hear from KA, Thanatos, WKFF and even D3V. I'm kinda tired of mister-scrubs-macjunior, here.

So, ChristiAnity teaches gay-bashing? Where? It calls the act itself "abomination" but does NOT condone mistreating anyone under those circumstances. Yet again, it's mans influence and prejudice, not of Christianity itself. Try again, mkay?

Or is it the Bible and other biblical scriptures that influence and suggest said prejudices against people who believe something other than what is written. Your argument isn't against D3V and your question fails to relate to his writing in any way. Do you not see it? Why else did I call you blind? His comments, like I stated earlier, were not at Christins, it was at idiots. However, you keep standing behind your beliefs holding tightly instead of giving your actual thoughts regardless of what the Bible and other scriptures tell you and suggest upon you. That he must be attacking Christins and hating them.

Draco, thank you for actually reading my post. I can understand (definitely where I live) that some Christians often think more of themselves than they should. You and I are the same. No better, no worse. I'd like to read that book now, it seems to mirror my views that absolutely nothing but faith is necessary and that organized religion is frivolous. I'd like to counter your intelligence point though. How is it intelligent to murder your family and burn the house (as happened to my girlfriends friend)? Or to murder unborn children under the defense of choice when the choice should be "have sex or don't?" That intelligence is flawed, though the examples might be as well.

Unborn creatures are not children, geez. Hey, I've got a present Ass Scruber, fuck you and your religion.

I think you totally missed everything I said.

His post said "religious people" to which I changed to Christian for the sake of arguement then generalized "you" to include everyone who has any problem with Christians.

It's so funny that you call me intolerant of gays when you use the unmistakeably derogatory comment "ass scruber." Then again, it might not be in reference to a certain act but I know it was.

I think you totally missed everything I said. His post said "religious people" to which I changed to Christian for the sake of arguement then generalized "you" to include everyone who has any problem with Christians.

I missed nothing. I know how you changed it, and I'm telling you that he doesn't hate Christins and was not trying to offend all. Only the dumb, ignorant fools. That statement was not a general statement, and you like I stated previously, took it out of context. I know he'll eventually post and tell you that he doesn't hate "religious people."

It's so funny that you call me intolerant of gays when you use the unmistakeably derogatory comment "ass scruber."Then again, it might not be in reference to a certain act but I know it was.

I'm intolerant, I stated that earlier, "I'm a greedy, vain, intolerant, agnostic bastard." Oh, and it looks like you might have understood the reason I stated "ass scruber." That part was actually meant as a joke.

Christins

OH MY GOD, SPELL IT RIGHT!!!

I know he'll eventually post and tell you that he doesn't hate "religious people.

Why would he? I never targeted him when I said that. Like I have stated, several times to the point of frustration, this is not meant as an attack on D3V (or anyone for that matter) and I am not asking him why he hates Christians. I don't believe he hates them. It's a generalization for anyone against Christians. I said "I will use considering the animosity shown by most members here" in reference to Christians because I haven't seen anyone here target Muslims or Buddhists because of their faith.

Also, what is the difference between:

Making fun of others based off of their beliefs?

laughing at them because they're crazy, idiotic, bastards

Actually, that would display a lack of intelligence. I don't think it wise to assume it was due to lack of religion though

I agree. A lack of intelligence that could be helped with the morals taught by Christ. Islam has laws that result in death, like Christianity does, yet for different reasons. I'd like to assume, though I don't have the evidence to back it up, that New Testament Christianity does not condemn anyone to death and allow a man to carry out the judgment. I know the OT does (in reference to bestiality).

Christins suck

Christins suck

Yes, Christins do suck. Now I've just offended people in whole.

Also, what is the difference between: Making fun of others based off of their beliefs? laughing at them because they're crazy, idiotic, bastards

When I was stating a comment on making fun of other based off their beliefs, I was referring to their God complex since you were bring it up. If it was a general statement you're now lying down, then there is no difference.

I'd like to counter your intelligence point though. How is it intelligent to murder your family and burn the house (as happened to my girlfriends friend)? Or to murder unborn children under the defense of choice when the choice should be "have sex or don't?" That intelligence is flawed, though the examples might be as well.

Actually, that would display a lack of intelligence. I don't think it wise to assume it was due to lack of religion though, as in the Muslim world, it is expected of one to behead his wife should a marriage fall through. Not to say they are less intelligent, but come on! Why else would you off the birthgivers, the only way to continue your bloodline?

And the only way I agree with abortion is if a woman gets raped. Other than that, I think the woman should keep the kid. If you were 'responsible' enough to have sex, then you are responsible enough to have the kid. If you don't want it, there are plenty of families that can't have kids and would do well to raise one through adoption.