Zelaron Gaming Forum  
Stats Arcade Portal Forum FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Go Back   Zelaron Gaming Forum > The Zelaron Nexus > Forum News, Suggestions and Discussion > Test Forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-10, 01:56 PM in reply to Asamin's post starting "Anything faster then the speed of..."
Asamin said: [Goto]
Anything faster then the speed of light= nothing

Hmm, does the law of conservation of mass apply to the speed of light or faster?
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution
 
 
-Spector-
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-10, 03:15 PM in reply to -Spector-'s post starting "Hmm, does the law of conservation of..."
I don't think it's even related.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-10, 03:43 PM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "I don't think it's even related."
I only brought it up because I initially understood Asamin's post as "Anything going faster than the speed of light turns into nothing" AKA is destroyed.

But that was just my mind wandering..
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution
 
 
-Spector-
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-10, 04:40 PM in reply to -Spector-'s post starting "I only brought it up because I..."
Well that's what he said, but that doesn't mean what he said holds any truth.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-10, 05:39 PM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "Well that's what he said, but that..."
Which was why I was asking about the law.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution
 
 
-Spector-
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-11, 08:30 AM in reply to -Spector-'s post starting "Which was why I was asking about the..."
-Spector- said: [Goto]
Which was why I was asking about the law.
I don't get it. Asking if a law applies to something that we haven't even experienced is odd. It's akin to asking if natural selection applies to aliens.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-11, 11:23 AM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "I don't get it. Asking if a law..."
!King_Amazon! said: [Goto]
I don't get it. Asking if a law applies to something that we haven't even experienced is odd. It's akin to asking if natural selection applies to aliens.

The distinguishability between scientific laws and theories is inherently arbitrary in places, e.g. in examples like "Scientific theories are generally more complex than laws". Why should Maxwell's equations (in the form of the Heaviside Four) be representative of a theory, when Newton's "Laws" of motion are no more simple?
"Stephen Wolfram is the creator of Mathematica and is widely regarded as the most important innovator in scientific and technical computing today." - Stephen Wolfram
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Chruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrow
 
 
Chruser
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-11, 12:09 AM in reply to -Spector-'s post starting "Hmm, does the law of conservation of..."
-Spector- said: [Goto]
Hmm, does the law of conservation of mass apply to the speed of light or faster?

In Newtonian mechanics, it would be possible, but unfortunately, it does not provide a valid description for what happens to massive objects at speeds approaching c.

To define a feasible, closed system in general relativity for massive objects travelling at c wouldn't work as the kinetic energy required would be infinite. Conservation of mass would still apply for objects with speeds exceeding c from some inertial frames (e.g. objects travelling through wormholes, although technically, ripples in spacetime can't normally occur in general relativity either), but you wouldn't be able to travel faster than c, locally.

I haven't read much about string theory, but I'm speculating that conservation of mass could be said to apply to tachyons, even though they have imaginary mass.
"Stephen Wolfram is the creator of Mathematica and is widely regarded as the most important innovator in scientific and technical computing today." - Stephen Wolfram
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Chruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrow
 
 
Chruser
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-12-11, 01:31 AM in reply to Chruser's post starting "In Newtonian mechanics, it would be..."
Chruser ♥ Ecstasy.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Wed-G is an uncelestial body of massWed-G is an uncelestial body of massWed-G is an uncelestial body of mass
 
 
Wed-G
 



 

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules [Forum Rules]
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gold miners!! check this out 1dumMan General Gaming 6 2006-01-21 07:34 AM
Price check: Adrena, read Pyro D2 Marketplace 1 2002-12-23 05:51 PM
Check it out! Kaotic General Discussion 5 2002-11-07 01:31 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 PM.
'Synthesis 2' vBulletin 3.x styles and 'x79' derivative
by WetWired the Unbound and Chruser
Copyright ©2002-2008 zelaron.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.