Shrink this for me?

No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.

This is how it always has been and always will be.

I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.

I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.

What the hell are you talking about?

What the hell are you talking about?

No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.

Avoid, block same thing. What i'm saying is the people that do get PMS about it don't have me blocked anyways, so wouldn't it essentially be ineffective as rule/feature?

This isn't about what's in posts. Obviously, this is fine as a post, because you're not banned. The rules for avatars and sigs are different from the rules for posts.

I know, WW.

god DAMN THOSE ARE SOME MONSTER TITTIES

el gay

i miss the avatar i had for like a week...

Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.

Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.

Rule for posts:

All humanoids in posted or linked to pictures or sites must be clothed.

Rule for Sigs/Avatars:

Avoid indecent/sexually suggestive content in signature and avatar especially, since users do not have the option to block only your signature/avatar.

If you post that image in a thread, I can avoid it to prevent from getting in trouble at work or wherever. If you put it in a signature or avatar, I cannot avoid it, because any thread you've posted in will have it. This is why the rule is more strict for signatures and avatars.

Dude I know the fucking difference you don't have to keep explaining it to me i'm seriously not that dull, what i'm saying is the reasoning behind the difference in avatars and post content saying that you can block out one and not the other is illadvised because blocking out posts never happens.

Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.

The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.

Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright. The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.

Christ K_A, you honestly think that I don't know the difference between the fucking avatar and one single post with boobs in it? You are just trying to be a jackass now and disagree. You are too dense to even comprehend what I've been saying to you, therefourth you fail, again.