Detectability of AA

[Sovereign]

Anyone know? :) :D

[PureRebel]

like every other hack on bnet, most likely is, but dont take my opinion yet..

[blckshdwdragon]

My opinion: Detectability of AA = rofl HAHAHA yes

[Sovereign]

I wasnt asking IF it was detectable. That is blatantly obvious. I'm wondering HOW detectable.

[blckshdwdragon]

well if u put it that way or either im reading too fast, then its as dectectable as farcast is, since shooting off ur view of sight (being 1 screen, duh) and you send a illegal packet to shoot off 2 screens away then gfg if blizzard made a server side scan for such packets, cuz it aint possible to fire 2 screens away unless ur scrolling. So i would ask blizz about that and get a responce of "Phuck t3h jOO nOOblar AA'ers, HWAHAAHAHAHAHAA"

[`Insolence`]

Not sure if AA is detectable, most likely it is.

But all bots are, ALL bots.

[Sovereign]

Even with guided arrrow? ;) . I usually am within distance though, i try not to make it obvious :p. Thanks.

[blckshdwdragon]

they have to be on ur screen since AA like clicks on them (sends the packet to directly attack them) if u dont want to send such a packet, but thats beside the point. the point is moreover the lines of "Did blizzard implement such and such?" so your asking a question when no one really knows but blizzard

[Vollstrecker]

so your asking a question when no one really knows but blizzard

All such questions have this response. To be honest, I don't think it's enough of a problem for Blizz to enable a distance vs. direct-attack check, but you never know.

[`Insolence`]

lol.

D2BS even has a built in off-screen click detector, it's in there, I gaurantee it. I've never used AA, I assumed it just shot in the correct direction, but if it locks on it is EASILY detectable...

just don't know whether blizz is jotting down the records :)

[PureRebel]

actually, it is possible to fire more than 1 screen away, but i think u have to hold your mouse key on the char b4 they leave the screen, and it keeps on firing @ them.

[Vollstrecker]

That's known as Namelock.

[Sovereign]

What,, you're confusing me.

[PureRebel]

zz, an example. when u kill meph with a FB/Meteor Sorc, u right click on him and hold down right click. and it keeps on attk'ing him when he goes off screen.

[blckshdwdragon]

holding down the click sends a diferent type of packet and ez differentiated thus name lock has no relevance

[Vollstrecker]

Name lock is holding down the attack button on a character's name even after the move off screen.

AutoAim does pretty much the same thing, except you never had to have the target on-screen. Actually, I'm sure if you compared the packets that they're likely the same. Maybe I'll check into that later. ;)

[blckshdwdragon]

Name lock is holding down the attack button on a character's name even after the move off screen.

AutoAim does pretty much the same thing, except you never had to have the target on-screen. Actually, I'm sure if you compared the packets that they're likely the same. Maybe I'll check into that later. ;)

no..... doing a manual name lock forces you to stay in 1 position, AA lets u move around and fire off screen thus they arent the same

[Mydogisyourdog]

many people seem to think that AA is very detectable, but in my own experience, the same as botting.

[PureRebel]

kk :):):):):):)

[blckshdwdragon]

many people seem to think that AA is very detectable, but in my own experience, the same as botting.

opinionated? stop coming up with strange responses ppl

[Vollstrecker]

You can't fire while moving, so it would likely send the same packet, as you have to stand still.

I'm not saying they're exactly the same, I'm saying they likely send the same packet. -.-

[blckshdwdragon]

FYI: they are indeed and in fact different packets, look at the packet list sometime in the bnet hacking section in the sticky "lost packet list"

[`Insolence`]

I believe the reason you can move with AutoAim is that the mouse isn't being used to lock.

But I forget whether or not you can move with the arrow keys.

Regardless the packet is (or should be) NEARLY the same, there is 1 packet for attacking, I believe.