Log in

View Full Version : Saddam porno? *runs*


Chruser
2003-04-16, 10:43 AM
http://entertainment.yahoo.com/entnews/wwn/20030410/104998680005.html

:shame:

!King_Amazon!
2003-04-16, 10:43 AM
I'm afraid to click, so I won't.

Eddie_Perez
2003-04-16, 10:58 AM
Like I said in other forum, who cares... since they claim he's already dead.

"CRØNîC-KîLLå"
2003-04-16, 11:54 AM
lol... seriouslly but o well now he can get more recognized ahha

quikspy67
2003-04-16, 12:48 PM
No I don't think hes dead.

Thanatos
2003-04-16, 12:55 PM
Hahaha, funny.

Ganga
2003-04-18, 08:00 AM
I heard this at the radio today, and I thought it was a joke.

FuRy
2003-05-17, 10:42 AM
I think he's out filmin child porn! lol...

Tanis
2003-05-24, 03:54 AM
I starred in a few of his films. He was gentle. lol, jk!

NonGayMan
2003-05-24, 08:09 PM
He's hiding out in a teepee.

quikspy67
2003-05-26, 11:48 PM
http://www.zelaron.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=17007

Soulmaster
2003-06-11, 10:20 AM
Of course he's not dead

zeal311
2003-06-12, 12:10 AM
I heard they found his bones.

Tai
2003-06-13, 03:54 PM
Hurray if he did die. Hurray if he didn't. More fun for the army either way.

Kuja
2003-06-16, 01:02 AM
I greatly doubt he is dead it wouldnt be usefull if they wanted him dead he would be dead it's more usefull for the U.S. if he still alive well not the civilian but the government it give them an opportunity to show that they are stronger, raise the moral troop, it make soldier die so they can be replaced by younger one and well there also some good side effect to war like after a big war it will take a long time before the next one so lot of death can be good cause anyway after a war there always lot of children given birth depending on the ammount of loss also technology breakthrough seem to happen much more during long war or after the war so basicly killing saddam would be bad cause he a weak opponent they wich give them the control of the situation if he were to die they would need another target and finding one like him would be hard cause the next 1 would probably not be just as suitable and controllable

Eddie_Perez
2003-06-16, 11:15 AM
Bump Bump Bump