Appearly you don't even know how to read either. Reread my first post couple times, and if you still have problem understanding, you should really quite school.
i reread it once, and i still dont see what your talking about...the retard math problem statement was aimed towards platnum because of his x=y-17...thats for retards, because its already answered.
NO NO NO . it hought he was giving an exdample of a simple math problem. you said solve for x, i thought his problem was x=y-17. I called it a retard problem becuase that was already solved for x.
LOl, Ok then I think i got everything wrong then, my bad calling you. We really need some system that say, this post is refer to post # 1 or what ever.