Zelaron Gaming Forum  
Stats Arcade Portal Forum FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Zelaron Gaming Forum > The Zelaron Nexus > Science and Art

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

 
Cannabis Extract For Cancer
Reply
Posted 2007-11-20, 10:10 AM
Any time something related to a medical use for cannabis is found, it makes headlines. Mostly, the interest is generated by the relationship to an illegal drug. Sometimes, though, the media do a decent job of reporting the real issue.

Researchers at the California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute have announced that one of the compounds found in cannabis, cannabidiol, inhibits a gene that is important for the growth and metastasis of breast cancer.

Note that this has nothing to do with medical marijuana, really. Cannabidiol is not psychoactive: it does not produce euphoria. Moreover, it is not possible to get enough into your body by smoking cannabis.

This has been reported by the Washington Post, UPI, BBC, ABC, and others. Most of the reporting is good, although there is one glaring error in the Washington Post article (I'll get to that).

The action is centered upon a pair of genes that are involved in the regulation of cell growth. Both genes code for proteins that are essential for normal growth. However, when growth is not regulated normally, it can get out of control. The result may be the development of a malignant tumor that can spread to various other body sites. If the expression of the genes is not properly regulated, then the proteins they encode are produced in unhealthy amounts. Thus, the regulation of gene expression is crucial for the proper regulation of cell growth.

The researchers involved in the studies included Sean McAllister, Ph.D., and Pierre Desprez, Ph.D.

They have been studying two genes: inhibitor of DNA binding-1 (Id-1), and inhibitor of DNA binding-2 (Id-2). In general, Id proteins tend to stop the differentiation of cells, and promote cell division. The do this by regulating transcription factors.

The CPMCRI researchers report that, in cultures of mouse breast cancer cells, the two proteins have opposite effects. Id-1 tends to promote proliferation of the cells, whereas Id-2 tends to restrain breast cancer cell proliferation.

What Desprez and McAllister found is that cannabidiol suppresses the Id-1 gene. This results in lower levels of the associated protein, which in turn results in less tumor growth and less metastasis.

Obviously, this is all very preliminary. The work so far has been done with cultured mouse cells. That is a lot different than cells in a live human. The news articles were careful to point that out.

The Washington Post article, however, contains an odd statement:

Quote:
In humans, the Id-1 gene is found only in metastatic cancer cells, said Desprez, a staff scientist at the institute. Before birth, they are present and involved in the development of human embryos, but after birth, they go silent -- and should stay that way, he said.
I don't think Desprez said that. Rather, the reporter (Carolyn Colwell) inferred that from something else. I don't think the gene simply disappears and then comes back. Rather, the protein that the gene encodes is what comes and goes. When the gene is silent, the protein goes away. When the gene is turned back on, the protein comes back. This point is peripheral to the main points in the article. I don't blame the reporter (too much), because it is a complex subject. It is easy to get confused. But I don't want to perpetuate the confusion by failing to point this out.

The results of the research have been published in the journal, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

Quote:
Abstract

Invasion and metastasis of aggressive breast cancer cells is the final and fatal step during cancer progression, and is the least understood genetically. Clinically, there are still limited therapeutic interventions for aggressive and metastatic breast cancers available. Clearly, effective and nontoxic therapies are urgently required. Id-1, an inhibitor of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, has recently been shown to be a key regulator of the metastatic potential of breast and additional cancers. Using a mouse model, we previously determined that metastatic breast cancer cells became significantly less invasive in vitro and less metastatic in vivo when Id-1 was down-regulated by stable transduction with antisense Id-1. It is not possible at this point, however, to use antisense technology to reduce Id-1 expression in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Here, we report that cannabidiol (CBD), a cannabinoid with a low-toxicity profile, could down-regulate Id-1 expression in aggressive human breast cancer cells. The CBD concentrations effective at inhibiting Id-1 expression correlated with those used to inhibit the proliferative and invasive phenotype of breast cancer cells. CBD was able to inhibit Id-1 expression at the mRNA and protein level in a concentration-dependent fashion. These effects seemed to occur as the result of an inhibition of the Id-1 gene at the promoter level. Importantly, CBD did not inhibit invasiveness in cells that ectopically expressed Id-1. In conclusion, CBD represents the first nontoxic exogenous agent that can significantly decrease Id-1 expression in metastatic breast cancer cells leading to the down-regulation of tumor aggressiveness.
Note especially that the authors state that CBD inhibits the proliferation of the cells, makes tham less invasive, and makes them less aggressive. They do not say anything about a cure.

On the CPMCRI website, they do not say that they expect CBD to be useful clinically. Rather, they say that it may serve as a template for other compounds that might turn out to be clinically useful.

Looking at the Medline database, these researchers have been at this for at least ten years already, just to get to this point. I won't even try to guess how long it may be before anything clinically useful may come of it. Even so, it is exciting to see a prospect for a safe drug that may have little or none of the unpleasantness that is so troublesome in so many anticancer drugs.

scienceblogs.com
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-11-20, 10:22 AM in reply to Demosthenes's post "Cannabis Extract For Cancer"
It doesn't matter if you can't get high off of this or not, people won't allow it. Same thing happens with hemp. Hemp has the potential to really give our economy a kick in the ass with all of the jobs it would create and all of the markets it would be in, but even though it's not even potent, to the point that you wouldn't be able to get high off of it, it's illegal.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-11-27, 02:38 PM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "It doesn't matter if you can't get high..."
I think this is just all about Marinol which is the commercial drug name for cannabidiol... and if you read reports on Erowid, it actually is possible to get pretty high off this pill.

I'm in michigan and a friend of mine works at the pharmacy in walgreens, he told me a couple months ago that only 1 person is prescribed to it in the city, and its for his nausea from chemotherapy.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution
 
 
-Spector-
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-12-05, 12:57 AM in reply to -Spector-'s post starting "I think this is just all about Marinol..."
http://www.marinol.com/
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution
 
 
-Spector-
 
 

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules [Forum Rules]
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cannabis FAQ !King_Amazon! General Discussion 68 2005-03-05 06:58 PM
Extract Audio from Mpeg Movie? Vollstrecker Science and Art 1 2004-01-16 08:36 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 AM.
'Synthesis 2' vBulletin 3.x styles and 'x79' derivative
by WetWired the Unbound and Chruser
Copyright ©2002-2008 zelaron.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.