112k Accs Banned = BS

Profile · Posted 2003-07-09, 12:33 AM

I've got a theroy. I think that B.NET made up that statement about banning 112k Accounts. I mean, all the people that were banned were banned long before that. I think they just said that because they were trying to scare newbies from using the maphack. I have still continued to use the maphack for months before and after that statement, and I'm fine. I don't think they can detect it, and I think they are bluffing.

BNET Staff Lies.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 12:35 AM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

They can detect certain packets. Like the socket protection, scrolling, etc.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 01:43 AM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

They can, and when you think about it, some people have 10+ accounts each, so its really possibly more of an understatement if any.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 04:13 AM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

I wasnt banned after the first banning but i was banned during the second banning, so no blizz staff does not lie(about the bannings atleast)

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 06:18 AM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

I was banned during the second round,but everyone else I know uses maphack and didn't get banned.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 08:21 AM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

2 of my accounts got banned too, so bots they can detect, but not map hack, i think, because none of my other accounts got deleted where i used mh and many of my friends accounts didn't get banned either (used mh, but not bot).

-Snow

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 08:42 AM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

Well my ip got banned i can't even connect to bnet now... This sucks!!!

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 08:43 AM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

I got banned due to tradehack, not due to MapHack. For once, I am thankful that my old computer cannot support a program. (New maphack: Cannot take off the socket protection thing without downloading a program that Win95 does not support)

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 01:08 PM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

You probably didn't get banned for the maphack, you probably were using D2JSp , or something. I doubt its the maphack.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 01:33 PM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

If all you use is the view map and the usual function from MH, they can't detect it. But if you're scrolling, aimming off-screen target, using socket protection, they are able to detect those packets.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 03:06 PM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

Nice to see how this topic went off topic...

I also do not think they can detect maphack; the statement was a fraud.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 03:11 PM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

d2jsp.org said:

Scroll Locking, and Socket Protection are detectable. Both send or use packets that, while at a glance are 100% correct, but are not 100% correct in their usage. You cannot send a start attack packet with something behind a wall, or off the screen. Similiarly, you cannot send the "swap item" packet on certain items without using Socket Protection. Similiar things in d2jsp are also detectable if your script uses them invalidly.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 03:15 PM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

Yea, stfu symn.

D3V · Posted 2003-07-09, 03:18 PM in reply to D3V's post "112k Accs Banned = BS"

Fuck off D3V. All you do is spam. Save your buttfucking son of a bitch comments for someone else.

Socket Protection: Here's a fucking idea, DON'T KEEP SOCKETED
ITEMS IN YOUR INVENTORY OR STASH ON BOTS.

The only other thing I can think of that would be detectable would be "fast cast". I can't explain what it is, but I'm pretty sure it's detectable.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)