The US should obliterate N. Korea.

As we all know, N. Korea have been testing nuclear warheads recently, and have quite a nice stockpile of missiles. Many believe they pose a threat, but some feel otherwise:

Why is the US so afraid of N. Korea and their Nucleur Bombs when we have Super Lasers that shoot beams as hot as a star. The US should just obliterate N. Korea and take it over.

The house proposes: "The US should just obliterate N. Korea and take it over."

Thoughts? Are you in opposition, or support of the proposition? Why?

No.

Terrorism is bad regardless of who is commiting it.

No. Terrorism is bad regardless of who is commiting it.

It isn't terrorism if you write the history books.

This is all on China's back. If they don't shut N. Korea down, then it's not our fault .

Why is it on China's back? If North Korea uses nuclear force against another country, we're just as responsible for not stopping them as China or anyone else.

China is directly enabling it by giving them power and helping them launder their money. If China quit sending aid over the regime would be gone in a few months probably ...a huge chunk of all their supplies crosses over from there.

Then it sounds to me like if we want things taken care of we'll have to do it ourselves.

I still don't see how any of that puts the responsibility solely on China to disarm North Korea.

Why is it on China's back? If North Korea uses nuclear force against another country, we're just as responsible for not stopping them as China or anyone else.

With China they can nuke people. Without China they can't. There doesn't have to be military action, if China will just shut off the flow of aid it's GG. That's why I think it's solely China's fault if they do nuke someone. They have almost absolute control.

Terrorists aim for civilians.
Legitimate war aims at military and government.
Dropping the father of all nukes to "obliterate N. Korea and take it over" isn't really aiming, so who's to say what it is?

Then it sounds to me like if we want things taken care of we'll have to do it ourselves. I still don't see how any of that puts the responsibility solely on China to disarm North Korea.

This is why so many countries despise the US, because we're always in everyone's business.

Let's just all be like Australia~

Terrorists aim for civilians. Legitimate war aims at military and government. Dropping the father of all nukes to "obliterate N. Korea and take it over" isn't really aiming, so who's to say what it is?

If I throw a hand full of rocks into a crowd full of people, I'm not aiming at any one person, but I'm still throwing rocks at people.

Also, God frowns upon killing innocents.

No. Terrorism is bad regardless of who is commiting it.

QFT.

Also, God frowns upon killing innocents.

GG.

See ya!

True as those things may be, it doesn't make dropping a bomb that will destroy a whole country terrorism. It may be a lot of things, but it isn't terrorism.

True as those things may be, it doesn't make dropping a bomb that will destroy a whole country terrorism. It may be a lot of things, but it isn't terrorism.

Is arguing semantics a big hobby of yours? You seem to like doing it, A LOT.

The point is, dropping a bomb on North Korea is WRONG. Call it terrorism or not, it's still wrong, and that's the point I was making. You're accomplishing nothing by arguing with me, other than further making yourself look like a douche bag.

Russia should 'bring down the hammer'.

As we all know, N. Korea have been testing nuclear warheads recently, and have quite a nice stockpile of missiles. Many believe they pose a threat, but some feel otherwise: Why is the US so afraid of N. Korea and their Nucleur Bombs when we have Super Lasers that shoot beams as hot as a star. The US should just obliterate N. Korea and take it over. The house proposes: "The US should just obliterate N. Korea and take it over." Thoughts? Are you in opposition, or support of the proposition? Why?

You know, it was a joke when I said we should just obliterate them. I was trying to express the fact that everyone is scared of a country that is not a real threat to anyone. The nuclear bombs they have are as powerful as the ones from WW2. We now have nuclear bombs ten-times as powerful. And if we wanted to, at any time, the US or other large country could annihilate them within a blink of an eye. That's what I meant by my statement. Okay, I'm out.

So because our bombs are bigger, theirs are less of a threat? A bomb that can decimate a city is still a bomb that can level a city, even if we have a bomb that can level a county.

So because our bombs are bigger, theirs are less of a threat? A bomb that can decimate a city is still a bomb that can level a city, even if we have a bomb that can level a county.

And the moment they blow up a city, we annihilate the country.

You just want a nuclear holocaust now don't yah?