.... Actully i dont belive in it, I say lock um up for life, its much worse punishment i think, because they Know there gonna die in prison anyway, plus horrible things happen in prison...
I actually belive in the death sentance becuase it costs something like 3 million to supply the person in prision for like 60 years, and the tax payers have to pay it.
If you are locked up for life, you would have the tendency to do terrable things in prison, what can they do to you if you are not going to get put to death?
I agree with Spa, we should just kill the fuckers slow and painfully. Like, put needles through their nipples. Cut their backs in 100 places, dump 100% alcohol over it. Stick firecrackers in their ass, and lite them. Then why not casterate them? After that, gut them, and hang them form a tree in a park (hung by their guts) as a morbid reminder you need to be good...
hmm, I think you should just lock them up, in Canada(eh) the maximum is 25 years without parole...it ticks me off when someone kills 20 people and gets 30 years...
Originally posted by Wiccan][V][asta I agree with Spa, we should just kill the fuckers slow and painfully. Like, put needles through their nipples. Cut their backs in 100 places, dump 100% alcohol over it. Stick firecrackers in their ass, and lite them. Then why not casterate them? After that, gut them, and hang them form a tree in a park (hung by their guts) as a morbid reminder you need to be good...
It really depends on what the crime was; if they brutally raped and beat someone to death, then execute them painfully. Like hang them, but right before they choke, cut them down. Then rinse and repeat
But if they did something like shoot a guy nicely or rob a bank then stick em in jail for 100 years. Remember Al Deguzman? The guy who tried to bomb De Anza College in Cupertino, CA? I live less than 200 ft away from de anza. That was scary, but since he just scared people he should goto jail for fourty years.
Technically the original translation was "Thou shalt not commit murder". Taking life is acceptable if in defense, but not when committed in malice.
death penalty is still murder. the person is not posing a current threat to anyone (as an enemy soldier would), so we're just killing people to get rid of them.
i disagree, its not murder, some ppl. dont deserve to live, especially when its our tax dollars that keep them alive, for example, some1 who tortures, molestes, and kills innocent children doesn't deserve to live
Quote:
Originally posted by mightychicken you can't kill spam, you can only delay its rage.
If anything, I think MORE people need to be executed. If execution rates increased significantly in this pansy ass country, maybe people would get it into their thick fucking heads that it's not okay to commit murder. Murder rates in this country are so goddamned high because people are 99% sure that they won't get the death penalty. It's all because of pussy ass treehuggers protesting the death penalty because they feel the need to have "a mission" in life. I tell you what, all you fucking dirty-ass hippies, go smoke some more pot and get hit by a fucking bus. Worthless, good for nothing, god damned hippies.
It's not as much about punishment, as it is about preventing more murder. By increasing the use of the death penalty, people will see that they are more likely to be executed for killing someone. Therefore, less people will commit murder. Our laws on capital punishment need to be FAR more rigid.
Linear Mode
