Post Count

Well its not soo much the post count that i like, but its the activity that boosts you to member/senior member.

heh That brings into perspective the whole member/senior member thing anyway. The fact that someone can spam up the forum and gain Senior Member status is disturbing.

It should factor in Longevity, or have Mod/Admin specified titles. I've been around for a while, but I still don't really consider myself a 'Senior Member'...

They can spam to their hearts content it wont make them a senior member. The only thing major pamming will do is give them free admition to banned camp (Rurouni Storm, i just had to use that one once ). Its your 6 month anniversary that will give you senior member title, that and 50+ percent activity.

I guess. I won't spam cuz there is know need to. Just a few posts here and there for the next few weeks.

They can spam and get the member status, but you can get the member status just as quickly without spamming. Remember, activity only counts the first 4 posts each day. The senior member status is and has always been based on longevity. You do have to already be a member to get senior member, however. This prevents leachers from getting senior member status.

Many times have I denounced the myth that spamming the hell out of the forums will get you senior member status, but apparently you are too new to have caught the last time.

There is also a member reputation thingy that isn't used. Depending on your position with the forum, your rating level varies, and the higher up, the more your rate can do good or harm someone compared to regular members. I wish that would be incorporated into the space below our avatar. That could help out new members with who to trust, and who to stay away from.

Actually, it's in the templates, but not enabled. Before the switchover, I and some other members did some playing arround with it and I decided that it's mostly worthless, just like the old gold system was. It looks good on paper, but I don't think it can work in practice. Originally, I was hoping on reputation to replace postcount when I first heard it would be in vB3...

Many times have I denounced the myth that spamming the hell out of the forums will get you senior member status, but apparently you are too new to have caught the last time.

Probably. I haven't hit 1 year yet. It has been mentioned that you get 'Senior Member' at 6 months before, I just forgot.

As far as the Reliability thingy goes, would there be a way for Staff to award members "points" per se, to show reliabilty? It may be a bit of work or such, but if a member makes contributions to the forums and such, they should be given some sort of rating or title to designate them as being helpful and reliable members.

I don't know how possible it would be, but it may cut down on the post-mongering.

I think that has there goods and bads. Honesty if a forum member and a staff member have some kind of beef, then that would be a disadvange for that member, and vise-versa. If a Staff member liked a forum member, then they would be in advantage, to other members acually trying.

To clear it up, I meant kind of a "score" from like 1-10. Like a Poll, staff would be able to vote once, and edit their vote at any point. That way, if there's beef between a staff member and a member, it really doesn't affect their rating, unless it was a problem with multiple staff members.

To make it reasonable, it would only apply to Senior Members, or something. That way, the entire staff wouldn't need to vote on all 4000+ members.

All this complicated shit... Just leave it be.

If something comes along that's revolutionaryly (is that a word?) better than post count, I'm positive WW will let us know untill then I'd like to see this thread die, I'm over the post count debate it's taken place well too much.

"Revolutionarily" would be the correct spelling of that word, Chrome. And yes, it is a word.

When post count starts endangering Zelaron, then we should do something about it. Right now it just annoys a few people who seem to have problems with everything.

The question is, how many would acually leave zelaron if they were taking away?

The question is, how many would acually leave zelaron if they were taking away?

this is sad. I am posting at school!!!

I have yet to see ANY forum properly use the reputation system.

I think post count should stay bcus it signify's seniority and participation which lets new members know who is the most knowlegable about the forum or most participant member in zelaron so that they can ask them for information and/or get a different perception on there replies/posts. Of course if ppl abuse Zelaron w/ spam and useless garbage, then they should be punished

Doesn't represent seniority... I have lower post count than alot of members here.. yet I am sup mod... status = seniority... quality of post = seniority..

I don't post super often... yet I am here... i sorta roam around not posting and just checking out threads

kinda what i do, i roam around. I spend most my time in this forum. =\

Your status doesn't show Seniority Ex, there were a few people who were mods before they even had any posts(I'm pretty sure shinto was one.) Like volstrecker said, he's a mod but he doesn't consider himself Senior member.

I'm not a mod and I consider myself a senior member.

I mainly don't feel like a Senior Member mainly because I'm not exactly recognized outside of the Diablo forums.

A true Senior Member (in my opinion) is recognized everywhere (if not respected). Give me a little while, and I'll be there.

Also, I would like to point out that being Senior Member shouldn't be confused with a contributing member, in general.

As far as the debate considering Post Count vs. Member Status, it's really hard to think of a better way.

yea, i am a senior member apperently, and i have just over 200 posts. lol.

I just roam around and post something if it interest me or something like this thread, a discussion on stuff.