Zelaron Gaming Forum  
Stats Arcade Portal Forum FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Zelaron Gaming Forum > The Zelaron Nexus > General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

 
Atheism vs Agnosticism
Reply
Posted 2008-05-29, 03:03 PM
This thread is long overdue in my opinion.

Even among the more intelligent people in society there is a misconception about what atheism is, what agnosticism is, and what the differences between the two are. People often think about the issue as a religiosity spectrum -- atheists and theists are diametrically opposite, while agnosticism is considered to be a moderate stance somewhere in the middle. Furthermore, an atheist is often considered one who obstinately disbelieves in God. These are both particularly vexatious fallacies.

Theism deals with belief whereas gnosticism, in this context, deals with an epistemic question. These are two entirely different spheres of thought, and are not mutually exclusive. That is the central thesis of this post.

The theist believes in the claim that God exists. The atheist does not believe it. Note that no claims of knowledge have been specified. Also note, that though an atheist does not share the theist's beliefs, this does not mean he believes in the idea that God does not exist. He may very well choose to do so, but this is not a prerequisite for atheism. An atheist is literally "one without theism." Not believing in an idea is not the same thing as rejecting in an idea. It may seem that I am getting agitated over petty semantics, however such implicit fallacies are often insidiously manipulated.

Another way to put this is there are two possible claims about the existence of God:

1. God does exist.
2. God does not exists.

Also, in the context of belief, there are two possible positions to take on each of the claims above:

1. Believing the claim.
2. Not believing the claim.

A theist is one who believes in claim 1 and does not believe in claim 2. An atheist is one who does not believe in claim 1, but can take either position on claim 2.

We can look at gnosticism in a similar way. A gnostic claims absolute knowledge about the existence or nonexistence of God, whereas an agnostic does not claim such knowledge. It is my opinion anyone who claims gnosticism to such an issue is either lying or deluded. However, the lack of absolute knowledge, or perhaps even the inability to ascertain this knowledge, should not prevent scrutiny of unjustifiable beliefs.

It should now be clear that knowledge and belief are distinct from one another, ergo the terms associated with each are not mutually exclusive. We can now describe people using four phrases in respect to their ideas about God: agnostic theists, agnostic atheists, gnostic theists, and gnostic atheists. In my experience, I have never met a truly gnostic atheist.

My speculation on why the initial misconception exists will be the subject of another post.

Last edited by Demosthenes; 2008-05-29 at 03:15 PM.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-05-29, 03:23 PM in reply to Demosthenes's post "Atheism vs Agnosticism"
A few of my friends like having the argument of "Atheist vs. Anti-theist". Some say that the correct term is "atheist", whilst others think it should be "Anti-theist". The fun they have leaving each other long-winded comments on Facebook.

What I'm asking is what's your view? "Atheist" or "Anti-theist", and is there in fact a difference between the two?
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Lenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
Lenny
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-05-29, 03:49 PM in reply to Lenny's post starting "A few of my friends like having the..."
Borh, Lenny.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution-Spector- is the result of 14 billion years of hydrogen atom evolution
 
 
-Spector-
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-05-29, 10:41 PM in reply to Lenny's post starting "A few of my friends like having the..."
Lenny said:
A few of my friends like having the argument of "Atheist vs. Anti-theist". Some say that the correct term is "atheist", whilst others think it should be "Anti-theist". The fun they have leaving each other long-winded comments on Facebook.

What I'm asking is what's your view? "Atheist" or "Anti-theist", and is there in fact a difference between the two?
Any chance I could request you to move this to Gen.? I didn't really mean it as an opinion or debate. No idea why I put it here.

You should bring your friends to the site. I would say there is a difference between the two. An atheist does not believe the statement that "god exists" and can either believe or not believe the statement that "god does not exist." An anti-theist is one who does not believe the statement that "god exists" strictly believes the statement "god does not exist." I guess an anti-theist can also be one who sees something extremely wrong with theism, where an atheist does not have to do this. By both definitions, I would say I am both an agnostic atheist and an agnostic anti-theist.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-05-30, 08:15 AM in reply to Demosthenes's post starting "Any chance I could request you to move..."
So MJ, I've got a question to ask you.

Now consider this, A horse, a cow, and a Deer all eat grass, correct? - Now; A deer excretes little pellets, a cow excretes out flat patties, and of course a horse produces nasty clumps of dry grass.. Why would you suppose that is?














Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
D3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidences
 
 
D3V
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-05-30, 10:06 AM in reply to D3V's post starting "So MJ, I've got a question to ask you...."
D3V said:
So MJ, I've got a question to ask you.

Now consider this, A horse, a cow, and a Deer all eat grass, correct? - Now; A deer excretes little pellets, a cow excretes out flat patties, and of course a horse produces nasty clumps of dry grass.. Why would you suppose that is?
I assume this has a point, possibly derogatory, related to this post? What is that point?
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-05-30, 10:33 AM in reply to Demosthenes's post starting "I assume this has a point, possibly..."
Do you really feel qualified......... to discuss Atheism vs Agnosticism when you don't know shit




No but really, I will have to agree with you on this.. as it clearly makes the most sense.

MJ said:
I would say there is a difference between the two. An atheist does not believe the statement that "god exists" and can either believe or not believe the statement that "god does not exist." An anti-theist is one who does not believe the statement that "god exists" strictly believes the statement "god does not exist."














Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
D3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidences
 
 
D3V
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-05-30, 10:51 AM in reply to D3V's post starting "Do you really feel qualified............"
gaytheism vs. gagnosticism vs. pisstianity
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Mantralord seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beMantralord seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beMantralord seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beMantralord seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
 
Mantralord
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-06-25, 07:40 PM in reply to Demosthenes's post "Atheism vs Agnosticism"
Just like how star can refer to a giant ball of burning gas or a really popular/well know person all of these words have multiple definitions.
That people almost always use them without enough accompanying information to establish which they are using can be quite irritating but this doesn't automatically default them to the most common definition.

It's like when a tacher asks her class if humans are animals. By one definition human qualities are exactly what makes them not-animals but by another they are most certainly animals as they are large motile organisms that don't photosynthesize and yadda yadda yadda. The teacher might be a decent person and give the students a little debreifing about how English works and why none of the answers were technically wrong for any reason other than that they assumed they knew what meaning she had for animal, or they may just elave it to the students to figure out even though they won't but will go on pissed off at each other until something else comes along to polarize them.


So in the end if you don't supply this information or enough context to make it clear that these definitions are the ones in use then it is your fault if anyone comes along trying to make things fit into their prefered definitions. And besides, with a quality so varied as "thoughts about the nature of God" you really shouldn't expect to be given one word that perfectly sums up your views in the first place. Sorry pal, aint that easy.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Tensa is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenTensa is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
Tensa
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-06-27, 05:17 PM in reply to Demosthenes's post "Atheism vs Agnosticism"
Either way it doesn't matter. According to the major occupied religions, you go to "Hell" either way. What seems most logical to me are Norse religions and polytheistic religions like the ones Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians studied. Those seem to make the most sense to me, scientifically, as well. I think it'd be impossible for one god to create the universe.
Snow is racist. It does not have an equal amount of colored snow as it does white snow. We must find a way to alter nature so that snow becomes colored.

When you decorate your tree for Christmas, you must put at least 24.8% colored bulbs, and they must be placed throughout the tree and not segregated in any matter.

Christmas presents must not be wrapped in white paper.

If Christmas music is to be played, under no circumstances is 'Have a White Christmas' to be Played.

Turkey may be served, but only if there is an equal amount of dark and white meat be served.

You must keep your colored and white dogs in the same room at all times, unsegregated, and they must get along at all times.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
zonalon is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
zonalon
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-06-27, 05:43 PM in reply to zonalon's post starting "Either way it doesn't matter. According..."
zonalon said: [Goto]
I think it'd be impossible for one god to create the universe.
What, exactly, makes you think that?
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Thumbs down
Reply
Posted 2008-06-27, 05:55 PM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "What, exactly, makes you think that?"
!King_Amazon! said: [Goto]
What, exactly, makes you think that?
Just something I believe in.. just like how monotheists believe that those gods would be false gods.
Snow is racist. It does not have an equal amount of colored snow as it does white snow. We must find a way to alter nature so that snow becomes colored.

When you decorate your tree for Christmas, you must put at least 24.8% colored bulbs, and they must be placed throughout the tree and not segregated in any matter.

Christmas presents must not be wrapped in white paper.

If Christmas music is to be played, under no circumstances is 'Have a White Christmas' to be Played.

Turkey may be served, but only if there is an equal amount of dark and white meat be served.

You must keep your colored and white dogs in the same room at all times, unsegregated, and they must get along at all times.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
zonalon is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
zonalon
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-06-28, 11:33 PM in reply to zonalon's post starting "Either way it doesn't matter. According..."
zonalon said: [Goto]
Either way it doesn't matter. According to the major occupied religions, you go to "Hell" either way. What seems most logical to me are Norse religions and polytheistic religions like the ones Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians studied. Those seem to make the most sense to me, scientifically, as well. I think it'd be impossible for one god to create the universe.
My God is said that as long as you're nice you go the heaven...

Also, it's only impossible for one person to create the universe. Not one God. That's what makes them a God.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Skurai has an imagination enthroned in its own recess, incomprehensible as from darknessSkurai has an imagination enthroned in its own recess, incomprehensible as from darknessSkurai has an imagination enthroned in its own recess, incomprehensible as from darkness
 
 
Skurai
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-06-29, 12:32 AM in reply to Skurai's post starting "My God is said that as long as you're..."
Skurai said: [Goto]
My God is said that as long as you're nice you go the heaven...

Also, it's only impossible for one person to create the universe. Not one God. That's what makes them a God.
Just curious, what is your religion? I don't think I know of any organized religion that believes that being nice is the only thing that you have to do to go to Heaven.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-06-29, 02:52 AM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "Just curious, what is your religion? I..."
!King_Amazon! said: [Goto]
Just curious, what is your religion? I don't think I know of any organized religion that believes that being nice is the only thing that you have to do to go to Heaven.
It's not a Religion, simply a love.
I believe in a God of understanding, not a God of rulers and punishment.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Skurai has an imagination enthroned in its own recess, incomprehensible as from darknessSkurai has an imagination enthroned in its own recess, incomprehensible as from darknessSkurai has an imagination enthroned in its own recess, incomprehensible as from darkness
 
 
Skurai
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-07-02, 05:04 PM in reply to Skurai's post starting "It's not a Religion, simply a love. I..."
i consider atheist as simply choosing not to believe in any "god" whereas agnostic is not believing due to lack of proof that such a thing exists.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
karmine is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenkarmine is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
karmine
 
 

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules [Forum Rules]
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Atheism and Theism are equally absurd. !King_Amazon! Opinion and Debate 33 2019-12-20 01:15 AM
The Passions of the Christ D3V Science and Art 26 2004-03-19 01:09 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.
'Synthesis 2' vBulletin 3.x styles and 'x79' derivative
by WetWired the Unbound and Chruser
Copyright ©2002-2008 zelaron.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.