i dont really think thats the way Diablo 3 would be played out, only because it seems kinda pointless to make the whole game over then just add 1 more act. and well 2 different classes as well. i think that, if that were to happen it would be a second expansion just like Diablo II: Lord Of Destruction.
If Blizzard were to make Diablo 3 i think they would make a whole new game... meaning Diablo and Diablo II are way different from each other which means Diablo III would prolly be way different than Diablo 2
But if your correct and Blizzard makes Diablo 3 as you say, which thats a rumors lemme remind you. I wouldnt buy it, i wouldnt wanna waist my time doing all of the same shit over for one more act and 2 different characters. Plus you would prolly end up paying 50 to 60 bucks for it... ( Yeah Right No Thanks )
I'm pretty sure GFrazier has publically announced that there will "not" be a Diablo 3 or any more expansion packs. I'm not positive, but pretty sure that was the general consensus.
well first off they are also working on WC3 patches and the d2lod patch so like he said i dont forsee it anytime in the 2003 maybe 2k4 but i doubt 2k2 or 2k3.
.....Broke the rubba, busted another all up in ya motha, so how u feel like havin another baby brotha? Wha? dont studda, ya pants hangin so low ya new baby brotha can be ya new lova!...... My Personal Website! www.dimensionforums.com
ÖWÑëÐ
Well i agree with hellmonkey. If its a full game then the hole thing will be different but in his concept ur just adding a new act and 2 more charaters so it should be an expansion and i dont think theres gonna b 2 expansion after another will there ? Also if d3 Is gonna be comming put it will be along while. It has not even made that 1.10 pacth yet and has said to be made like 10 month ago. And sc2 is not even out yet so i think it will be a LONG LONG LONG LONG while which d3 WILL be comming out.
Linear Mode
