Grav's Proposition Revision Draft

Heres another rateing, GbNG Good but NOT Great. Could be the rateing under SoA. Comments?

I think we are looking for accronyms that sound like what they actually mean, or at least a play on words. Like, ummm...

ZING - Zero Intelligence and Never Good

You know what I mean..

DaC / DnC Dazed and Confused, for some reason kaos comes to mind. I'am not good with accronyms.

DICK

Deliberately Impersonating Careless Knuckleheads

FAG - Fixated with Acting Gay

We need more intermediate ones, not just all these bad ones, which have equivalent level ratings...

large

lacking a respectable grammar-school education.


Maybe making this whole thing optional. I know my posts are not that sophisticated and shit and I'm not looking forward to getting ghaadd or whatever the hell it is.

Is this going to happen? Yes or no.

I don't know. I'll IM Chruser later and see if he and WW want to tackle this.

People really need to keep this going, becuase it's an incredible idea.

I'm too lazy to want to bring it up.. Maybe everyone should IM Chruser about it.. Don't tell him I suggested it though!

*Shhhhhhhhhhhh*

I would IM him, but he would say something random and philosophical and I'd cry.

For Pete's sake, get the ball rolling, people.

To be perfectly honest, this was much cooler when it was just Grav. The proposition as is is just too bulky, too slow. The optimal method for doing this is to have 5 council members, each is presented with a button of some sort on each post which takes them to a form where they can choose a number 0 to 10. Each time they rate a member, their previous vote is replaced. Existing votes on a member make up a rating based on the mean plus the median. No council discussion, no time consuming member vote. To be perfectly honest, I'm as addicted to RO as most of our members used to be to D2, and I just can't make the time to work on such a blown out of proportion feature as you are trying to make.

To be perfectly honest, this was much cooler when it was just Grav. The proposition as is is just too bulky, too slow. The optimal method for doing this is to have 5 council members, each is presented with a button of some sort on each post which takes them to a form where they can choose a number 0 to 10. Each time they rate a member, their previous vote is replaced. Existing votes on a member make up a rating based on the mean plus the median. No council discussion, no time consuming member vote. To be perfectly honest, I'm as addicted to RO as most of our members used to be to D2, and I just can't make the time to work on such a blown out of proportion feature as you are trying to make.

This sounds like an excellent solution. All in favor?

Yeah I sure am!!!!!!

Sounds even better to me. I simply made this so bulky trying to accomidate everyone's wants and needs. I had no intention of this being the final say, just the revision of everyone's thoughts. In the end, you would be the one making the features, so whatever suits you best and is agreeable.

Woot!

To be perfectly honest, I'm as addicted to RO as most of our members used to be to D2, and I just can't make the time to work on such a blown out of proportion feature as you are trying to make.

Doesn't look like it's happening...

Or does he mean he would do his idea just not our original one.

And speaking of which, we wouldn't need catchy acronyms, all we would need is a rating level/number system. Like a 10 star reputation and shit... could get interesting.

I'm very, very disappointed that D3V was absent from that List. But nonetheless, its a good draft, and It will most likely turn into a popularity test. Well, only time can tell.

Only five people will be able to do the votes, in other words it won't be a popularity contest.