LulzSec

Exactly. They are doing wrong for the right cause, and that I can stand for and support. I love their actions, and I do believe as well that they are using some sort of diversion to possibly misdirect investigators. I'm excited to see what Anonymous and Anti-Sec bring forth in the next few weeks/months.

They're disbanding because they got 0wned. A friend of mine just leaked this to me:

http://www.pastie.org/2173213

lololol

So did the Legion win again, or what? I'm lost.
If there are two things I want, it's for both Anonymous AND the government to be taken down. Too much law is bad, too much chaos is bad.

I could agree with that viewpoint, potentially.

In my opinion, the lack of law AND chaos alike, will allow us to view the *true* nature of individuals. It would simply be reduced to "Help, Ham, and Hurt".
In my opinion, the law would have minimal power, only capable of dealing with the most severe crimes (murder, theft, etc.), while it would have to be up to our own moral values to keep from falling into total chaos.

According to most online quizzes and such, I tend to be around True Neutral. I probably tend toward Neutral Good and Neutral Evil depending on my mood.

LULZ!

http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20...aper-web-site/

Hackers target Murdoch newspaper Web site

The LulzSec hacker group has turned its sights on Rupert Murdoch's U.K. newspaper The Sun, hacking the site to direct visitors to a fake article claiming the media mogul had died and releasing information on journalists. The group announced on Twitter that "The Sun's homepage now redirects to the Murdoch death story on the recently-owned New Times website. Can you spell success, gentlemen?" The New Times site was inaccessible this afternoon, but screenshots captured before it was taken off line show a headline that says "Media Moguls Body Discovered" and a story that said Murdoch had taken a large quantity of palladium, a metal that resembles platinum.

tango down.