Klo's Banning.

I actually never really liked her anyway. She was annoying, and her posts rarely made sense. I'm glad I won't have to eventually gauge my eyes out with an ice pick from reading too much of her dribble.

We still have members posting who are almost as bad, if not worse.

We still have members posting who are almost as bad, if not worse.

Who, exactly?

The only person who can even compete is Kyeruu, and he isn't really posting that much.

Well, there is the small problem of him saying he's on holiday for a month from the 6th.

That's a problem?

It is if he's supposed to be posting.

The big difference between Klo and Kyeruu is one knows when to shut up.

He was the only one that came to mind.

I actually never really liked her anyway. She was annoying, and her posts rarely made sense. I'm glad I won't have to eventually gauge my eyes out with an ice pick from reading too much of her dribble.

So what if people didn't like her? She wasn't a real nuisance and she kept this forum entertaining. We need drama around here in order to survive. If not, it's the same ol' boring shit that I've been accustomed to for the past ~4 years.

She was banned for a simple reason: KA threw a bitchfit because he was tired of being embarassed at her expense and rallied the other staff behind him. It's that simple. KA's side of the story is that every post from her was about KA in some way, shape, or form. Not entirely true. Yeah, she went out of her way to flame KA but he brought it upon himself when the argument escalated to a personal level with the thread about Kaneda.

For a while, every single one of S2 AM's posts were about me and how he didn't like that I smoked pot. He wasn't warned/banned or anything of the sort. But, Klo is? Why? Because KA has to get his way and the simple fact that Klo owned him on more than one occasion.

So what if people didn't like her? She wasn't a real nuisance and she kept this forum entertaining. We need drama around here in order to survive. If not, it's the same ol' boring shit that I've been accustomed to for the past ~4 years. She was banned for a simple reason: KA threw a bitchfit because he was tired of being embarassed at her expense and rallied the other staff behind him. It's that simple. KA's side of the story is that every post from her was about KA in some way, shape, or form. Not entirely true. Yeah, she went out of her way to flame KA but he brought it upon himself when the argument escalated to a personal level with the thread about Kaneda. For a while, every single one of S2 AM's posts were about me and how he didn't like that I smoked pot. He wasn't warned/banned or anything of the sort. But, Klo is? Why? Because KA has to get his way and the simple fact that Klo owned him on more than one occasion.

Your view of what has happened is very, very skewed.

Maybe. But I'm not saying anymore on this subject. What's done is done and I know that anything I say/do won't change anything around here so there's no point.

GG

Wow that sounds almost identical to what I had gone through, lmfao. You guys all need to just lighten up a bit and take that chip off of yah shoulder.

S2AM is funny though, Klo is a dumb biznitch!

S2AM doesn't really post anyway, and plus he's been overseas and in Iraq for the last few years, so we should cut him some slack anyway. Right??

I don't have a problem with him. I was just pointing out the fact that him and Klo's situations were very similiar, yet she got banned for trolling and he didn't even get warned.

I don't have a problem with him. I was just pointing out the fact that him and Klo's situations were very similiar, yet she got banned for trolling and he didn't even get warned.

Was I a mod then?

A common flaw in your arguments is that you think something in the past either justifies or unwarrants something that happens now.

For instance, you say that I've done things in the past and not gotten banned for them, thus I should not ban people for them. That's a fallacious thought.

Just the same with you saying that people in the past were not banned for X, so you shouldn't be banned for X either.

Was I a mod then? A common flaw in your arguments is that you think something in the past either justifies or unwarrants something that happens now. For instance, you say that I've done things in the past and not gotten banned for them, thus I should not ban people for them. That's a fallacious thought. Just the same with you saying that people in the past were not banned for X, so you shouldn't be banned for X either.

I can reacll tons of times that this same sort of shit happened to myself way back when during the time of when I would just come on here to cause hell with everyone just to give myself and a few others kicks for no apparent reason.

The only thing you can do is just not let it linger on you because if you aren't a mod you can't do anything about it anyways, so who cares, just keep strolling about as you were before you got all pissed off.

ka sucks. im kinda sorry i rigged the poll for him to win a spot

I'm tired of you two bitching at each other. STFU. Closed.