Grammar_Wizard said:
I can't even find a place to get in a word about this subject without hearing "Space-Time distortion", let-alone actually sit down and have a reasonable physics discussion...Time is an abstract human concept created to aid us with every-day life. Without it, we would undoubtedly fall into anarchy, but it's not a physical thing!... Not that I might not try to prove that you will, but now I"m in a literal physics minded mode, and I say time cannot be altered!
|
What exactly do you want to talk about when you mention "Black" and "Hole" if it doesn't involve the abstract?
Also, time is a thing not invented by man. Man created units of time to measure it, but
time itself passes whether someone counts it or not. Man defined time, he did not invent it.
Additionally, time itself is not arbitrary. Only time relative to other things can change. However, nobody ever discusses time not in relation to something else. Therefore, it is
wholly possibly to alter time. The easiest example is by altering temperature.
When temperature is brought closer to absolute zero, things slow down. The frequency of a cesium atom is 9,192,631,770 Hz. This is the frequency used to define a second. As temperature drops, the frequency drops. This arbitrarily changes the length of a second relative to this atom.
It can be argued that only the atom slows down and that time passes for it normally. However, the length of time required for any reaction to occur increases as temperature approaches absolute zero. This means that if all existence were to experience temperatures of this magnitude everything would slow together.
If everything were to slow proportionally, then to everything in existence, time would seem the same. One second would be based upon the frequency of a cesium atom. This frequency, no matter how much smaller than that of a higher temperature, gives the length of a second to the people experiencing this extreme temperature that is exactly the same length in perception as the one people not experiencing this extreme temperature have.
These statements hold true no matter what the test subject is. This in mind, let us say that one building in downtown Dallas is exposed to and held at near-absolute zero temperatures, and by some unknown force, the people in that building do not suffer harm from this temperature. The length of
time that it takes for the hour hand of a clock to make a revolution inside the building (as percieved by those people) is the same length of
time that it takes the hour hand of a clock to make a revolution outside the building (as percieved by those people).
This means that their own personal arbitrary times are unchanged. However, if a person outside of the building were to view someone inside the building, he would witness someone moving at an incredibly slow rate. Thus, time inside the building would be slowed
in relation to that outside.
If you're not talking about relative time dilation, then you obviously don't know what you're talking about.
Also, somebody please move this out of the flame forum...