Okay, I've been a bit too lax about this for the last few battles, but now it has to end. I'm reinforcing the 24 hour time limit rule. If I don't have your argument by 24 hours, the tread is getting closed and the judges will decide based on whatever is there. If there are problems with that, then it's just too bad. Samus vs. Turok will be closed today, and the following battles will be alloted no more than 24 hours, and those rules will not be broken under any circumstances. This is mainly my fault, so I'm letting you all know that it is going to end effective immediately.
Well, lets see how it goes for the the time being. We can't have too much time alotted per battle, each tournament would take way too long. Maybe more time will be alotted for each round after the first, but 24 hours for the first round seems reasonable to me.
Kuja, you seem to passionate about the battles to be able to judge them.
I say we put a post limit and a time limit on them, and whichever is reached first, the thread then gets closed. That way, if the post limit is reached, you know people have said what they want to, and if the time limit is reached, they've said all they are going to say. This should eliminate the problems.
Kuja, you seem too passionate about certain combatants to be able to judge them.
There. Well, nothing wrong with being passionate, but if you have trouble staying neutral when looking at battles, it is better for you to not judge.
Edit:
It is a good idea to enforce the time limit...and again, I know absolutely nothing about both characters in this match (Err...not really absolutely nothing...) to participate.
11:49 Skurai said:
I don't have to study for math, I'm technically a genius, just don't care to show.
If someone is going to be a judge, they'd better know who all of the participants are, I certainly remember a post from Kuja's saying he didn't know anything about the characters (I believe in was in the Grey Fox vs. Tatsumaru battle)...
I think Senesia would make a good judge. Not knowing the participants would help you stay nuetral, since you would just base your vote on the arguements, which is the whole idea of this, right?
Alright then, you are the third judge. There is no problem whatsoever participating and being the judge, you just can't be biased totally. If you feel someone should win, but better arguements were given, you are obligated to go against yourself. Be fair is all.
Well, I don't know all the characters, and honestly, that makes it better to be a judge in that instance. Now, instead of having a pre-conceived notion of the who I think should win, I am forced to read everything and make a judgement based on the way we want a judgement to be made.
Okay, Uncapped, I guess the position is yours. I'll be expecting your decision on all matches at the appropriate time, regardless of battle inactivity. If you happen to be on one day, and you know you're not going to be on later that night when a particular match ends, give me your decision in a PM anyway, just so the match can be closed on time.