.....If you were to make a case for going on a rampage, what would
your reasoning be? The fact that "nobody cares" is a typically avoided
political agenda worth supporting. Throughout the history of this
century (not merely a decade), and the latter centuries before the
millennium, humans have found diversity to be a main cause for wars.
Knowledge of prohibition as an ever-present act of oppression does not
enable one to fight it. For example, your fellow humans (so-called) will
actively urge you to fight on if you desire to retain your true nature. He
who desires to change the world's dislike of him makes changes to his
true nature in the end. The development of self-monitoring or "coping"
skills have been incorporated into the modern mechanics of common-
sense curriculum as they provide teachers with a weapon in which the
students have no single unitary appeal beyond the squabble of a dispute
with the teacher herself. Fighting back addresses itself specifically to the
building blocks of the "every man for himself" paradigm.
For me to consider going on a "rampage", it would have to be over something that I am particularly sensitive to, like witnessing child abuse. Or if perhaps I were a parent, I would certainly go on a rampage if something were to happen to my child, like a kidnapping, rape, etc.
Simply being overcome by jealous envy lends itself in the end to induce a kind of moral Gestalt in enforcing
prohibition. Since, as in the problem of the act of atrocity, it could end in being construed as fulfilling some
primitive appetite. Note how there is no word in the English language less dramatic in intensity as the word
you have chosen as a response to witnessing an event in agreement with your predisposed sensitivities. The
word as it relates to the actual fact is forgiving and concerned with the nature of things if it is to have
anything to do with reality and not just subjective jealousy.
Simply being overcome by jealous envy lends itself in the end to induce a kind of moral Gestalt in enforcing prohibition. Since, as in the problem of the act of atrocity, it could end in being construed as fulfilling some primitive appetite. Note how there is no word in the English language less dramatic in intensity as the word you have chosen as a response to witnessing an event in agreement with your predisposed sensitivities. The word as it relates to the actual fact is forgiving and concerned with the nature of things if it is to have anything to do with reality and not just subjective jealousy.
Fix't.
Personally, I would need to feel like my life is meaningless and the only thing that would make me feel better would be to slaughter some people. Females have them 4-5 days outta each month, they're called Periods.
Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]