|
|
|
|
Posted 2008-04-01, 07:24 AM
in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "What the hell are you talking about?"
|
|
|
|
!King_Amazon! said:
What the hell are you talking about?
|
KA said:
No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.
|
Avoid, block same thing. What i'm saying is the people that do get PMS about it don't have me blocked anyways, so wouldn't it essentially be ineffective as rule/feature?
Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
|
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|