View Single Post
 
Reply
Posted 2019-12-03, 11:03 PM in reply to Chruser's post starting "Apparently there's a new, pretty cool..."
I don't understand the purpose of trying to figure out a random delineation to mathematically prove an idea of a theory of a thought of a skeptical outlook of a quandry that literally solves nothing.

Let's say you can determine the exact starting point of the "walkers" then what has exactly been accomplished and what can come from this in practicality terms?














Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
D3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidences
 
 
D3V