|
|
|
|
Posted 2004-06-26, 02:53 PM
in reply to BlueCube's post starting "True, I was thinking of ratings from..."
|
|
|
|
Well obviously not, I could type things like
"Your mother is an enormously gay pig fucker"
all the time, which is a fine spelling, but it wouldn't make me worthy of an SoA, I know what you're saying.
I think a system of 0 to 6 would work.. everyone does a rating of someone based on A) Language usage and B) Content.
So let's say we have the 5 council people.
Person 1: A) 5 - B) 3
Person 2: A) 5 - B) 4
Person 3: A) 4 - B) 3
Person 4: A) 5 - B) 5
Person 5: A) 3 - B) 4
A) average is 22 / 5 = 4.4
B) average is 19 / 5 = 3.8
So using your weighted system, [((4.4* .35) = 1.54), + ((3.8* .65) = 2.74)] = 4.01.
Out of 6, that's a good rating, overall, but a SoA would be a 5 or higher.
GAHH would be 2.75 or lower, and BLIS would be a 1.5 or lower.
(Just random numbers, not set in stone or anything)
If there was a range of more than two, say one guy gave him a 2 on part A, and another gave him a 5, and everyone else was 3 and 4, one or both of those could be replaced by "backup council" members so to speak, to avoid bias.
Last edited by GravitonSurge; 2004-06-26 at 03:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|