View Single Post
 
Reply
Posted 2010-04-14, 01:55 PM in reply to KagomJack's post "A moral calamity"
I would weigh out all possible solutions and focus on the ones with the most upside. Killing would not be an option, even in a fantasy world. Depending on the demographics of the state, location and all, they could be forced into a seceded state until their finances and other issues could be resolved. For the time being make them run as an independent entity so that their local governments can rely on the specific state for funding requirements, as well as logistical solutions.

I would also take into consideration where my budget for the rest of the country is headed, if there is spending that can be frozen or eliminated, then obviously that would be the first step taken to help restructure the damaged goods. A socialist outlook on this problem would most definitely solve it, and when the states would return to regular productivity and blossom back into their standings amongst the rest of the states, they will then again become profitable and the entire nation's power and wealth would boost significantly.

I would throw money at the issue, but selectively. I don't look at people as pawns, even if it were to be in a hypothetical power-weilding scenario.














Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
D3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidences
 
 
D3V