(Disclaimer: I think most conspiraces are normally horseshit. We landed on the moon, the fuel used to get there is measurable and accurate. Aliens do not exist and it was a propaganda effort during the 50's and 60's - etc)
My views and opinions have changed slightly over the past few years.
I feel I've matured, and have become more adept at making adjudicated judgements with all aspects of life.
However, one thing that has not changed is my skepticism of the official 9/11 Commission Report. The pancake theory of World Trade Center 7 does not add up. It never has. The buildings construction
I'm not the only person skeptical, either. 2,330 Architects and Engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation of the events surrounding September 11, 2001.
http://www.ae911truth.org
I would like another attempt at a civil debate.
Here is a view of WTC 7 as it begun it's uniform, 7.3 second fall to the ground.
The pancake theory, that the outer rings of the walls fell apart from the central structure causing collapse would be correct - but there is an issue given the vertical beams are not visible, and did not collapse outwards, sideways, horizontally in any matter. Why?
This video quite accurately sums up my skepticism. It is NOT correct to blatantly accept the story of the government, but it is also not correct to accuse the "Bush Administration" of being 100% complicit in carrying out any sort of evil scheme.
NIST admits in the final version of their report that the building falls at near freefall speed. The rate of gravity. 9.8 m/s-29.4 m/s through the progression. There are multiple videos.
But why?