View Single Post
 
Reply
Posted 2004-09-06, 12:18 AM in reply to D3V's post starting "KJ For all you know, 9/11 never..."
Quote:
The contention is not that the fire melted the structural steel. Only that the heat made the steel weaker and more malleable at the higher temperatures. Steel becomes weaker as its temperature increases. The fire is not isothermal, some parts would have reached higher temperatures than others.

The author mentions the amount of structural steel in the buildings as if implying that the planes would need to melt all or a significant proportion of it to collapse. All that was required was that the steel supports were sufficiently weakened in a few small, but critical, areas and then the building would come down.
. .
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes