Shhhhhh! Dominating America one forum at a time.
|
Was probably me, I usually just try and get a rise out of people, but honestly, you think the Bush Administration could plan something so elaborate? Didn't think so.. that's my only stand behind it, we can't even fucking get a correct war strategy to effectively eliminate our enemies while trying to accomplish a goal, it's as simple as that.
|
Well, seeing as there is a lot of conflict in our government, I doubt they could even come close to agreeing to this. Having 100% of your government plan to fuck you over? Yeah, maybe in some third-world country. Just look at the controversey over the Attorney General. I think planning to attack two large trade centers, the Pentagon, and potentially the White House would receive way more attention.
Oh, and in that video that The1 posted, there is a part about Israeli's being warned via instant message. Keep in mind that there was roughly 4 years between that video and the attacks; more than enough time to make up fake stories and roots. |
Quote:
That said, I have heard claims of the towers falling at anywhere from 8 seconds to 18 seconds. The 8 seconds is not really possible. Lets, once again, look at the math. Newtonian mechanics dictates a fall time of at least 9.2 seconds: t=sqrt(2h/g)=sqrt(2[416]/9.81)=~9.2 Even if the government planned the fall, they can't change the laws of physics. An explosion is outwards. It would not cause the towers to have some initial velocity when they begin their fall. If anything the initial velocity would be upwards at an angle. This isn't even taking into account the resistance of the building (which would be relatively minimal) and air resistance. If you want a more accurate time depiction for the fall, check out the seismic disturbances in NYC on 9/11. http://www.ditrianum.org/Graphics/91...ic_records.jpg Through careful interpretation of this data, it has been estimated that it took 11.3 +- 1.5 seconds for the towers to collapse. This is more believable as it doesn't defy physics. And about your church claims, you can't prove that a guy didn't live for 600 years. Just as I can't prove that the towers didn't fall in 8.4 seconds. Except I can prove that they didn't fall in 8.4 seconds. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Since Quote:
|
I find it strange that people take an event such as 9/11, and twist it to make It into some kind of conspiracy.
Why can people not be more like us English? The government was behind 7/7! Tony Blair planted the bombs himself! Lobbocks. Four fellas with backpacks. End of. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Temper, temper. You're not in the flame forum.
|
You're arguing with probably the smartest member at Zelaron, The1. You better have more to back up your statements than opinions.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And you have yet to respond to any of the science. GG. Mj 1, The1 0. Quote:
Forget the fact that millions of people actually saw the remains of the plane. We can explain that away as the media controlled by the government!!! You belittle people for religious beliefs. Then you post this shit. You're a hypocrite. |
Quote:
I just laugh someone goes to church and smokes marijuana... And doesnt beleive he's commiting a sin.. Even thoe it's against the law. |
Troll 1, everyone else 0.
|
Can anyone explain how the hijackers got into the cockpits ?? I heard from many airplane facilitys that they dont allow anyone in.. and they carry a gun in the compartment.. So explain how the fuck did lil towel heads take over ???
|
Quote:
Mj 4, The1 0. Don't like that either? How about golf: Mj -2, The +27 (clearly every one of your posts has been a triple bogey) No? Suggest a different point system. Actually, I could give a rats ass less about what the score is. What I was really trying to entice you to do was respond to the fucking evidence. Too dense to see that? Yea, just like I remember you. Quote:
Quote:
You're making my job of making you look like a moron all the easier. Quote:
|
How were the laws of physics changed to permit the heat from the burning jet fuel to fatally weaken buildings constructed of 150,000-200,000 tons of steel?
Why did the South tower collapse, since most of the jet fuel apparently was ignited in the fireball accompanying Flight 175s crash? Why did the sections of both towers that were above the fires disintegrate as soon as they collapsed rather than landing as large blocks? (Both buildings collapse from top to bottom very similarly to what demolition experts call a “smooth wave.”) Why did World Trade Center 7, which wasnt hit by an aircraft or falling debris, collapse at all? Apparently it is the first large building in history that completely disintegrated from a fire. To add further fuel to the raging discussion, the WTC changed ownership just eleven weeks before the towers went down. In addition, we’ve been recently informed that key surveillance tapes and maintenance logs were destroyed in the disaster (link). Finally, the speed with which Controlled Demolition Inc. removed and shipped away the debris is drawing criticism. CDI is reportedly the same firm that also swiftly removed the debris from the Oklahoma City bombing. http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero...le/trou_en.htm Which is to small to be a plane... The1 - 7 / mj - sadly -3 |
You can't explain or doubt or question anything that you don't have more information on.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.