Hey that is a good system for it.

Wetwired: I think you might add somewhere in there to say that if you want your square picture to compeltely use the circle it needs to be 600 x 600 resolution. At least for me that is what I have figured out, minor tweaking follows.

I think that's the best I've seen as far as big avatars go, actually. Most people just stick something bigger in it, and hope it doesn't look retarded.

Actually, it's 150x150, and it tells you.

if you create a 150 by 150 picture it doesnt fill the whole circle, in my experience... my pictures i use as avatar's are all 600 x 600. perhaps its just me tho

If you upload anything larger, it downsizes it so that the longest dimention is 150px. Maybe the image you're using has a border? It's also possible that it's something with the resize code if your image takes up too much disk space.

Just to let you know, the Ginormous avatars don't work very well with Google Chrome.

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97...882/chrome.jpg

Nor does the WYSIWIG editor, strangely enough.

Get a browser that supports z-index, thank you

Don't worry, it's not my default. :p

I'd have thought that by now WebKit would support z-index. Ah well.

Actually, I think it's some obscure interaction. Maybe you should bring it up with the developers and see what they say. I've looked into fixing it, and I can't find anything wrong with the way I'm doing it. Not only does each part have a z-index specifying the stacking order, but they are in the document in the order they should be stacked, which is the fallback plan if there are no z-indexes, according to the standard, IIRC.

I've had that same problem lately, but only at home and with firefox. I use the same version of firefox at work and at home (2.0.0.16), but it only happens at home. The only difference I can think of is I'm running Vista in 64-bit at home, whereas at work I'm just using XP.

just looking for confirmation, is there in fact only a level 2 now? or is it still a level 1 then you move up to level 2

Perhaps you should re-read it, because obviously you are at level 1 right now, what with the large avatar and all.

eh, where could i read that i am level one atm? all level two gets you is the abillity to move down to 20%, theres nothing defined anywhere that says hey, your level 1

Besides the simple logic of "I haven't been at 100% for 28 days then posted 'complete'," there's always
http://zelaron.com/forum/showthread.php?p=580469

you edited that after i had posted for confirmation, also - it was said there is no level two anymore, so the simple logic of me posting complete wouldnt be a valid defense.

you do realize all this required was a simple yes or no answer right?

It gets edited all the time. What's your point? Your name wasn't on the level 2 list when you posted the original question, so obviously you weren't level 2. Also, wouldn't you expect an official announcement if the rules had changed? If nothing else, it's obvious that Thanatos is at level 1 (because his full avatar shows in his profile, but only the 80x80 center on his posts) and that Chruser and me are at level 2 (because we're under 75% and have large avatars in our posts).

Look at that, I am like 40 some % and have my avatar big. I don't know if I am level two.

Everytime I get close to 100% I end up having to leave for whatever reason like WAR. Or in this case away from war.

Cry more noob.