View Full Version : Shrink this for me?
I need this to fit filewise as my avatar and am too lazy/unknowing of how to shrink the file size (compress)
HandOfHeaven
2008-03-31, 08:49 PM
Sweeeeet!
talentedhamster
2008-03-31, 08:52 PM
*sigh of dissapointment*
WetWired
2008-03-31, 09:02 PM
Trying for another ban, huh?
There's nothing wrong with that...
HandOfHeaven
2008-03-31, 09:05 PM
:D I need to go to the washroom now... :(
Trying for another ban, huh?
Doesn't violate any rules.
WetWired
2008-03-31, 09:25 PM
Avoid indecent/sexually suggestive content in signature and avatar especially, since users do not have the option to block only your signature/avatar.As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.
!King_Amazon!
2008-03-31, 10:34 PM
As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.
Hope you don't mind explaining it again in a week when he tries again. If you haven't noticed yet, he's pretty dense.
Goddamnit, these rules need to change, seriously. First you say no nudity, then you say no partial nudity, then you say no nudity if they are technically nude (hand bra), then no partial nudity or partly nude etc. Meh. I just want a new avatar.
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-01, 07:14 AM
No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.
This is how it always has been and always will be.
I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-01, 07:18 AM
I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.
What the hell are you talking about?
Thanatos
2008-04-01, 07:21 AM
el gay
i miss the avatar i had for like a week...
Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.
WetWired
2008-04-01, 07:22 AM
This isn't about what's in posts. Obviously, this is fine as a post, because you're not banned. The rules for avatars and sigs are different from the rules for posts.
Thanatos
2008-04-01, 07:24 AM
god DAMN THOSE ARE SOME MONSTER TITTIES
What the hell are you talking about?
No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.
Avoid, block same thing. :weird: What i'm saying is the people that do get PMS about it don't have me blocked anyways, so wouldn't it essentially be ineffective as rule/feature?
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-01, 07:25 AM
Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.
Rule for posts:
All humanoids in posted or linked to pictures or sites must be clothed.
Rule for Sigs/Avatars:
Avoid indecent/sexually suggestive content in signature and avatar especially, since users do not have the option to block only your signature/avatar.
If you post that image in a thread, I can avoid it to prevent from getting in trouble at work or wherever. If you put it in a signature or avatar, I cannot avoid it, because any thread you've posted in will have it. This is why the rule is more strict for signatures and avatars.
Dude I know the fucking difference you don't have to keep explaining it to me i'm seriously not that dull, what i'm saying is the reasoning behind the difference in avatars and post content saying that you can block out one and not the other is illadvised because blocking out posts never happens.
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-01, 05:41 PM
Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.
The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.
Asamin
2008-04-01, 06:12 PM
As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.
Awwww come on. Let him do it. You know all the guys here would love it!
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-01, 06:18 PM
Except for the ones who have jobs and visit from work and could potentially get fired for it.
Atnas
2008-04-01, 10:16 PM
Those boobs are too big.
talentedhamster
2008-04-02, 03:05 AM
yeaaaaa. i dont wanna see that
Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.
The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.
Christ K_A, you honestly think that I don't know the difference between the fucking avatar and one single post with boobs in it? You are just trying to be a jackass now and disagree. You are too dense to even comprehend what I've been saying to you, therefourth you fail, again.
WetWired
2008-04-02, 09:23 AM
Or maybe you're spewing gibberish and only you understand what you're saying.
Asamin
2008-04-02, 05:31 PM
Then make a thing that allows you to block someone's avatar and/or sig. But ya. Those are some friken big boobs!
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-02, 06:17 PM
Or maybe you're spewing gibberish and only you understand what you're saying.
This. I'm done.
Asamin
2008-04-03, 03:21 PM
Nice. Got him owned there. Poor guy.
-Spector-
2008-04-09, 07:58 AM
bt mon eh?
Wed-G
2008-04-09, 09:34 AM
Then make a thing that allows you to block someone's avatar and/or sig. But ya. Those are some friken big boobs!
Nice. Got him owned there. Poor guy.
I haven't posted in this thread until now just because getting in the middle would be unwise, but posting stuff like this is just unnecessary.
First, it's not that easy to just, "Hmm, I guess I could make a avatar filter." WW has too little time as it is to implement such a feature if possible.
And two, I honestly don't feel that anyone got "owned" here. It's a legitimate discussion and the goal shouldn't/isn't to humiliate the other to prove your own dominance.
Thanatos
2008-04-09, 10:24 AM
Epic boobs.
talentedhamster
2008-04-09, 04:27 PM
aren't they your sisters?
hahaha i win!!
Atnas
2008-04-09, 04:29 PM
Delicious incest. : D
Asamin
2008-04-09, 06:17 PM
aren't they your sisters?
Damn right they are! He is one desperate SOB.
Wed-G
2008-04-09, 09:59 PM
Damn right they are! He is one desperate SOB.
Anyone feel this thread has gone to spam? Not trying to feign authority here but I think it's bled dry.
Back to the topic, shrinking the image to fit within the guidelines would be impractical if not impossible. It's nearly half a megabye and contains 117 images so getting it smaller would involve taking out images.
HandOfHeaven
2008-04-10, 12:28 AM
Test.
Kaneda
2008-04-10, 12:52 AM
1.You guys are stulid for not allowing that.
2.OOOOOOOLD Dev old
Back to the topic, shrinking the image to fit within the guidelines would be impractical if not impossible. It's nearly half a megabye and contains 117 images so getting it smaller would involve taking out images.
Yeah, I don't have a program that would break that up into single frames, if I did I could easily compress it down myself and resize it all. But I don't, and now I don't care. It's not worth getting banned, because apparently cleveage was added to the list of things not allowed.
WetWired
2008-04-10, 07:18 AM
because apparently cleveage was added to the list of things not allowed.In avatars and sigs. Four years ago.
Well, your signature contains multiple links to Bit Torrents, which is highly illegal through my work. I think you should remove them. If I were to accidently click on them and download anything I could be fired/sued. That is against company policy, and state policy to share and distribute copyrighted material.
WetWired
2008-04-10, 07:23 AM
My sig contains zero links to bit torrents. Further there is no copyright holder in the states for any torrents linked to from any sites linked to from my signature.
I got to this through your links.
http://www.animesuki.com/torrents.php
You may not direct or link people to places that they can find specific copyrighted materials illegally.
..
WetWired
2008-04-10, 08:38 AM
there is no copyright holder in the states for any torrents linked to from any sites linked to from my signature.
And no, none of my links linked there.
And no, none of my links linked there.
Here i'll dumb it down for you like you try and do for me, just to be fair.
You may not direct or link people to places that they can find specific copyrighted materials illegally.
WetWired
2008-04-10, 08:50 AM
Yes. I may not respond to your question "where can I get Naruto" with neither "you can get it at X site" nor with "http://Xsite.com". Neither may I say "Hey guys, go get Naruto at X site" nor "Hey guys, go get Naruto at http://Xsite.com". However, the rule allows linking or mentioning sites that have an array of stuff, both legal and illegal, as long as noone mentions specific, copyrighted works.
Just admit you're wrong. If I were to link any site, even remotely partaining to anything possibly copyrighted/liscened then I would more than likely get a swift ban and post deletion. I just feel like the rules are too vauge, still.
WetWired
2008-04-10, 10:48 AM
No, the rule was worded as it is specificly to allow the discussion of torrent search sites and the such. We just don't want the forum to be a place where people list all their torrents and such.
And again, every torrent listed on animesuki does not have a copyright holder in the US (they take down all listings when the copyright is purchased), so even if the rule is vague to you, that much should make it obvious that it doesn't apply.
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-10, 05:42 PM
How about we just permaban D3v and get this over with. I'm sick of his constant attempts to get around the rules. At least permaloser or permafag would be good.
Thanatos
2008-04-11, 07:55 AM
EPIC BOOBS.
Kaneda
2008-04-11, 11:39 AM
You don't think there is some kind of video mischief going on there Thanatos? Aside from the reversing.
How about we just permaban D3v and get this over with. I'm sick of his constant attempts to get around the rules. At least permaloser or permafag would be good.
Stay on topic, i'm being serious.
Willkillforfood
2008-04-11, 01:05 PM
D3v's a valuable and contributing member. Hell, just about every member in a community this side has some sort of value. Anyways, you guys just like to give him a hard time :P.
Wed-G
2008-04-11, 03:40 PM
Yeah, I don't have a program that would break that up into single frames, if I did I could easily compress it down myself and resize it all.
It's not the resolution that's the problem, it's the file size limit. It's 29.3 KB, roughly the size of a couple frames.
I'm not sure if there is a size limit on remote linked images so, that might not be a problem after all.
If I resized this for him, would I be banned for it?
-Spector-
2008-04-13, 10:41 AM
Not if you only put it in a post.
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-13, 10:59 AM
Stay on topic, i'm being serious.
I must not have visited that day when they made you a mod.
!King_Amazon!
2008-04-13, 11:00 AM
Anyways, you guys just like to give him a hard time :P.
I don't know how you could possibly see it that way. It's completely the other way around. D3v could be a great member but he decides to be a troll instead.
HandOfHeaven
2008-04-13, 11:11 AM
New trolling rule! Yay Chruser.
Thanatos
2008-04-13, 01:41 PM
el gay
those are some epic boobs
talentedhamster
2008-04-14, 06:14 PM
get over it
Thanatos
2008-04-15, 06:45 AM
EPIC FUCKING BOOBS
I need this to fit filewise as my avatar and am too lazy/unknowing of how to shrink the file size (compress)
damn, Had to see them again, definately going on the sidekick.
talentedhamster
2008-04-28, 07:35 PM
bet your girlfriend feels GREAT about herself
Her fun cans are just as big.
Shining Knights
2008-04-29, 08:41 PM
It matters not whether you win or lose; what matters is whether I win or lose.
Thanatos
2008-04-30, 07:50 AM
EPIC FUCKING BOOBS
what he said
can somebody move this to the chat forum? I'm done testing, going to post more of the same.
Wallow
2008-05-03, 05:14 PM
Hmmm, from a scientific standpoint, proportionate and massive boobs!
Kaneda
2008-05-03, 08:51 PM
How are those proportionate?
Very unproportionate, she probably walks around with a crutch and wheels to keep those bad boys off the ground.
Wallow
2008-05-04, 10:13 AM
I felt like saying something scientific that way. And proportionate in their roundness.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.