View Full Version : Lambogreeny
Adrenachrome
2008-03-04, 05:09 PM
http://www.ajc.com/business/content/business/stories/2008/03/04/AutoShow_Green0304.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_tabau tos1
GENEVA — Lamborghini introduced a lighter, faster and greener version of its successful Gallardo at the Geneva International Motor Show on Tuesday, as demand for cars with a smaller carbon tire print seep even into the supersports class.
The sleek Gallardo LP560-4 — low-slung and sleek as a bullet — weighs 44 pounds less than the previous model, and the revamped engine gives up only three-tenths of a second from zero to 62 mph, now 3.7 seconds.
...44 pounds? Seriously? That makes little difference against tons...
There really isn't anything "green" about this car.
Adrenachrome
2008-03-04, 08:27 PM
Emmisions have been cut by 18%
I'd say that's a fucking good start.
44lbs.....
The percentages don't mean much against the actual numbers.
Adrenachrome
2008-03-05, 03:55 PM
Wait, I'm confused. You think the Lambo weighs tons? or tons of carbon?
18% of 1000lbs is 180lbs
the 44 is the car weight difference
The car weighs tons. So dropping 44 pounds, when compared to even one ton, is not much.
Adrenachrome
2008-03-05, 09:24 PM
What the fuck are you talking about, this is about less carbon emissions. 18% they lowered them even if the car weighed the same or more this is still good.
Demosthenes
2008-03-05, 09:45 PM
What the fuck are you talking about, this is about less carbon emissions. 18% they lowered them even if the car weighed the same or more this is still good.
/signed
I'm gonna' have to agree with 'Chrome there, Grav.
From the article:
"The new Gallardo still emits 325 grams of CO2 for every kilometer, or just over half a mile, compared with an average of 150 to 200 grams in the same distance for a more typical car"
It still produces 50% more than what is necessary from a car, even with the 18% reduction. It's just a waste, IMO.
Adrenachrome
2008-03-07, 07:59 PM
From the article:
"The new Gallardo still emits 325 grams of CO2 for every kilometer, or just over half a mile, compared with an average of 150 to 200 grams in the same distance for a more typical car"
It still produces 50% more than what is necessary from a car, even with the 18% reduction. It's just a waste, IMO.
I just love how you omitted the very next sentence in that paragraph.
But Winkelmann said that is offset by the fact the average Lamborghini is driven just over 3,100 miles a year.
Of course it's a waste you fool. It costs almost a quarter million dollars. Go kill yourself.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.