View Full Version : "Arguing, Rules, and the Enforcement of the Latter" - A Thesis written by D3V
Any particular reason? Less interesting threads? What's goin on here?
I'm not allowed to voice my opinions or beliefs without getting riddiculed on a daily basis; without forewarning receive a number of infractions, and inadvertenly become banned.
Thanatos
2007-11-05, 02:14 PM
Lmao.
Just don't argue with KA so much. I know that's gonna be hard, but you guys need to just frackin drop it.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-05, 02:25 PM
Lmao.
Just don't argue with KA so much. I know that's gonna be hard, but you guys need to just frackin drop it.
Don't put it on just me. I'll take my share, but it's not all me and D3v.
Also, it's not only me that's been banning him.
WetWired
2007-11-05, 05:55 PM
Try studying the rules
http://zelaron.com/forum/faq.php?faq=rules
And remember, we enforce the spirit of the rules. Phone number isn't link = loophole = banned.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-05, 06:15 PM
What, are you trying to talk some sense into D3v? Good luck with that.
Try studying the rules
http://zelaron.com/forum/faq.php?faq=rules
And remember, we enforce the spirit of the rules. Phone number isn't link = loophole = banned.
I know what the rules are, what is allotted and what it not. It's you that has the problem deciding who, what and when to enforce the rules.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-06, 08:33 AM
I know what the rules are, what is allotted and what it not. It's you that has the problem deciding who, what and when to enforce the rules.
You are dumb.
Try studying the rules
http://zelaron.com/forum/faq.php?faq=rules
And remember, we enforce the spirit of the rules. Phone number isn't link = loophole = banned.
My point is you guys need to observe the rules accordingly to all members, and if not, make a seperate section for the people you are going to hold them against, and a section of members you don't care about and let slide... Accordingly.
WetWired
2007-11-06, 03:42 PM
It's quite simple. Repeat offenders get the book thrown at them, while first-timers get a warning. That's often how it works in real life, too.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-06, 04:25 PM
It's quite simple. Repeat offenders get the book thrown at them, while first-timers get a warning. That's often how it works in real life, too.
Exactly. Kagom was warned for the link he posted.
Regardless, what anyone else did has nothing to do with what you did. The fact that others did things does not justify you doing them, and the fact that I've done things in the past does not justify you doing them either.
You need to grow up and take responsibility for what you do. Every time anything happens to you you try to find something or someone to blame it on, to excuse it, etc.
Willkillforfood
2007-11-06, 06:00 PM
I've been banned a few times myself also, haha.
Exactly. Kagom was warned for the link he posted.
Regardless, what anyone else did has nothing to do with what you did. The fact that others did things does not justify you doing them, and the fact that I've done things in the past does not justify you doing them either.
You need to grow up and take responsibility for what you do. Every time anything happens to you you try to find something or someone to blame it on, to excuse it, etc.
Where did I say anything about Kagom in here?.. Pretty presumptuous of you..
I'm not blaming anybody, maybe if you would've read i'm only saying you should either go by the rules accordingly, or not at all. Maybe a revision of rules is in order, hence they aren't being enforced unless the situation is specifically in your favor.
WetWired
2007-11-07, 07:46 AM
No, you did mention Kagom. You were complaining about unequal enforcement, the only obvious recent occurance relating to Kagom. And as I said, the rules are being enforced according to the offender's record.
HandOfHeaven
2007-11-07, 07:53 AM
So if you've had one minor consumption of alcohol, generally the fine for the second is much larger. There, painted a picture for you D3V, in case you don't understand WW.
So if you've had one minor consumption of alcohol, generally the fine for the second is much larger. There, painted a picture for you D3V, in case you don't understand WW.
Don't get involved, nobody was even refferring to you, this is not your situation, I understand completely, but however I do not agree with what they are displaying.
No, you did mention Kagom. You were complaining about unequal enforcement, the only obvious recent occurance relating to Kagom. And as I said, the rules are being enforced according to the offender's record.
In that particular case he's posted 3 threads containing NWS links and posting once in a thread that was already going on.. Not trying to bring Kagom down, but in the past week and 1/2 he's done this. As well for K_A about 2 weeks ago he posted a NWS link and then was corrected, he has a past history probably more-so if not equal to mine. Whatever, this is a pointless argument trying to convince you guys from your biased opinion.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-07, 08:28 AM
Don't get involved, nobody was even refferring to you, this is not your situation, I understand completely, but however I do not agree with what they are displaying.
This is in a public forum which is open to everybody. He's just as welcome to be in the conversation as anyone else, and he's right.
In that particular case he's posted 3 threads containing NWS links and posting once in a thread that was already going on.. Not trying to bring Kagom down, but in the past week and 1/2 he's done this. As well for K_A about 2 weeks ago he posted a NWS link and then was corrected, he has a past history probably more-so if not equal to mine. Whatever, this is a pointless argument trying to convince you guys from your biased opinion.
Give links, please. The only NWS link I remember Kagom posting was to encyclopedia dramatica. The only other thing he has really done was posted the rickroll, which he was warned for. The NSFW link was accidental and he had removed it before I even got to the thread, along with an apology.
How this differs from what you've done is you were WARNED about posting NSFW material outside of the NSFW forum, specifically stating that if a model is covering herself with her hands she is not clothed and is therefore not allowed. I know WW has said that at least twice.
Either way, this is unrelated to the discussion. What Kagom has done or not done and what punishments he has or has not recieved does not have any effect on anything you have or haven't done or any punishments you have or haven't recieved.
I knew D3v couldn't have titled a thread this way.
Vollstrecker
2007-11-07, 04:18 PM
I knew D3v couldn't have titled a thread this way.
I almost believed, and clicked the link to verify.
Thanatos
2007-11-07, 08:50 PM
This thread blows.
HandOfHeaven
2007-11-07, 10:32 PM
I like waffles more than pancakes.
gruesomeBODY
2007-11-07, 10:43 PM
im mad that this is the most activity in the forum
HandOfHeaven
2007-11-07, 11:09 PM
Me too. Time to make popcorn.
I got a haircut, so I don't look like a hippie anymore.
gruesomeBODY
2007-11-08, 12:09 PM
picture please. I dont think i have ever seen you without the hippie hair
HandOfHeaven
2007-11-08, 01:22 PM
I don't have my camera cords. They are 180 miles away. Just think of the pics I posted up, on you can see my whole face and ears. Wish I could post a pic, I look damn good.
DaFrigginDoctah
2007-11-12, 02:08 PM
That's a really long, weak thesis. I would enjoy reading your essay based on this thesis.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-12, 02:18 PM
See, this is exactly why abusive mods like Lenny shouldn't make thread titles deceptive.
demod lenny
Thanatos
2007-11-12, 02:32 PM
His first post doesn't go with the title of the thread. It makes no sense whatsoever.
WHATSOEVER. Lenny, you fucked up big man... you just don't do that....
think of the children
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-12, 02:44 PM
Rip off his balls, IMO.
Lenny
2007-11-12, 03:03 PM
Think of it as a blurb, rather than a title.
Whilst a title may reveal nothing, a blurb can reveal everything.
Fuck you, Lenny. Fuck. You.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-13, 07:10 AM
God damn the mod abuse in here is just fucking sickening. I'm absolutely disgusted by this! I WANT JUSTICE!
HandOfHeaven
2007-11-13, 07:13 AM
Where the fuck is D3V? He fall off of a bridge?
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-13, 07:48 AM
Clearly Lenny ran him off. Fuck you Lenny!
Thanatos
2007-11-13, 08:04 AM
Lenny fucked up
BIG
LYNCH HIM.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-13, 08:29 AM
Seriously. I can't believe he's still a mod. Shows how much the admins care now. Lenny fucking runs this place.
Thanatos
2007-11-13, 08:52 AM
Hahahahaha. Good stuff.
I can't find the link to where I said that about you.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-13, 09:16 AM
I was improv-ing it anyway. I don't remember what you specifically said.
He's just kidding. He actually has a log on his webspace of every single thing anyone has ever said about him. Ever.
!King_Amazon!
2007-11-13, 09:19 AM
lol u got me grav
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.