NFC vs. AFC

[Titusfied]

The NFL this year is pathetic. Again, like many years prior, the AFC is just a bunch of powerhouses when compared to the NFC. Sure, the NFC has some good teams, such as Philadelphia, Minnesota, and St. Louis to name a few, but the AFC is just stacked! Other than the clear elites, New England and Pittsburgh though, all the other teams are just top heavy, with their offenses being the top.

If more teams would learn to play defense better, the league would be much more even, rather than this lopsided top heavy team domination. ESPN has referenced it on their website, and I agree completely: Other than the top three teams, which are solid choices (Steelers, Patriots, and Eagles), the number 4 through 11 teams are interchangeable on any given week. No one really dominates like those teams.

Overall, AFC >> NFC.

[HandOfHeaven]

I agree. The AFC almost always is better than the NFC.

[SurrealWaking]

Which is Seattle in? ^.^; I heard they were bet to go to the Superbowl...which is complete bullshit. If Hassleback could throw to his own team, maybe.

[Titusfied]

Seattle is NFC. They are decent, just not playing up to their potential. They are however, making a slight comeback as of late. They are relatively good.

[SurrealWaking]

They need to put Dilfer in more.

[MightyJoe]

I go with the AFC, for this year. But with how football is set up next year it could be the complete opposite. The salary cap really makes every team have a decent chance.